But it did mean something. Given Love's panicking in the red zone, they had the FG tie as a fallback. Rodgers would have hit #13 who beat Diggs in the end zone and they would have won the game. Parsons' sack gave them the option to settle for the tie. Better than a loss and might have implications for tiebreakers later.
The website servers would be down lol
I agree with you. But if Dak scored a TD there the Packers would have been more aggressive. They had the tie in their back pocket and kind of played it slow at the end of OT. I doubt Dallas' defense would have prevented a TD if Green Bay displayed more urgency.
I agree with you. They had the TD without the urgency if Love sees #13.
Parsons has huge guaranteed amounts..... no way way around it. Its not a good deal for the team.
The goalposts will be moved to wherever they need to be for Micah to be overrated.
Eh, it's jilted ex sydrome. "When I cheered for you, I was faking it." Lol. A lot of it has to do with money too. This was done to Ware. Everyone was calling for him to be cut saying it was business, not personal. But as soon as he got snatched up and signed a nice contract with Denver people made it personal and trashed him even after saying they wanted him gone a few days prior. Hard to use the salary cap excuse in that case. There are people that just want to see players denied making that kind of cash so Micah became uber-hated once he broke the non-QB record. So they'll use the $47M number as justification and conveniently ignore that front office competence would have had him signed at $35M.
Did people hate Lamb getting paid?
Sure, there were some. Saying he melted down in the GB playoff game, got punked by that DB there or saying that no WR deserves that amount of money, etc. The latter is standard for a lot of new contracts signed. Thing is, Lamb wasn't even highest paid at his position the way everyone knew Parsons was going to be.
Haha - yep, 4 games this year was a stretch...but he was on the field during both playoff losses to the 49ers and of course last year's beatdown by the Packers.
He's come up woefully short vs physical teams and that surprises me since he's a "Penn State" LB. I'm thinking of games vs the Bills, 49ers, Eagles. He was a major reason the Cowboys couldn't stop the run because he was chasing sack and was allergic to setting the edge (but everybody piled on Mazi).
I'll give you the Packers game, Micah didn't play well at all, but the other three playoff games the Cowboys defense gave up..... *checks notes*......56 points in three games. I'll take a defense that gives up 18ppg any game regardless of the sack numbers.
He graded out as the best run defender across the entire defensive line. I don't think he was the problem.
Ahh, you just make up your own facts.
So you telling me he's worth more than Patrick Mahomes? No, he's not.
You can ignore the non-guaranteed part of the contract. The contract was structured the way it was for the sake of the bonus. Both parties know Parsons will likely be cut or restructure prior to his $74M cap hit in year 5.
