Hotel perhaps. If he wins. This is very early and he may not be fired from his job. But like I said. This is not his first strike. 2017 he was accused of drugging and raping a girl in a Florida hotel. Wonder which hotel it was maybe a Marriott hotel. Lol. He said he had left to catch a flight and timing of the story didn’t match up to her story or something. The whole thing went away. Now this happens..
Not a dime from Marriott. They have high priced lawyers too. If they were simply protecting the rights of their employee and exercising their right to remove a guest due to behavior then they have zero to worry about.
He has a long history of problems. With women. Remember 2017. Don’t know if these women are looking for a quick buck or if he is doing wrong.
I assume you're being sarcastic. There's zero evidence she is seeking any publicity or financial gain.
At some point in time however through your description of events, EXACTLY what was said MUST be documented in writing as to why the course of action was taken.
See CouchCoach comment above. I can't improve on that.
No one in my family is a despicable LIAR throwing out phony accusations like this woman. There is no evidence whatsoever that Irvin has done anything wrong. I hope Irvin's lawyers annihilate her.
Lol yeah people who were saying don't rush to judgment we don't have the facts are now lapping up his lawyers account of events. Poor Michael was just peacefully sleeping when the Marriott Gestapo pulled him from bed and tossed him onto the street.
Personally I'm not lapping anyones account of what actually happened because other than an apparent video that really doesn't show anything and some people who were actually there saying they didn't see anything inappropriate, there really haven't been any facts presented other than Irvin being asked to leave.
The hotel, woman or the NFLN isn't obligated to be forthcoming and all have legal counsel to instruct them how to handle this.
Well that's all Marriott (and later his employer) asked him to do. Unless one thinks it's some big conspiracy to get him, it's logical to think they had reasons.
Do you know that apparent video is the one hotel security is using? The video, according to the earliest report, was the hotel's from the lobby, not a bar patron's phone. Do you know if that is the video or even if that is the woman?
Marriot management KNEW this was going to be BIG news. For that reason alone, they should have the incident documented to the hilt on everything. If they shared that documentation with Irvins employer and Irvin had that documentation, common sense tells me Irvin wouldn't be stupid enough to make more news by suing so quickly.
At this point, I don't think anyone knows anything per this case.
For some reason this forum seems to attract more than it's share of guys who have a lot of pent up hostility toward women. It's kind of disgusting.
Right. He'd have to somehow prove she acted with malice. Anything else is just basically her opinion. You have to be careful when you're a high profile person.
