yimyammer
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,574
- Reaction score
- 7,004
He hasn't coached a single game with Dallas and people already don't like him. Goodness.
you ain't seen nothing yet, just wait til the season gets rolling
He hasn't coached a single game with Dallas and people already don't like him. Goodness.
Also long winded. Someone must be bored.That's pretty harsh......
Let me preface my comments by saying I’m not contradicting you or arguing any point. I’m thinking aloud.
According to pundits and players, when an offense can run the ball well (however you reach that assessment), defenses are forced to commit extra defenders near the line of scrimmage, presumably making it more difficult to defend the pass.
In the aggregate, statistics show that running ball well does not correlate to passing the ball well. But I wonder how much those stats are skewed by differences in quarterback talent—ie Aaron Rodgers is going to be more efficient than Marcus Mariota no matter how many pass defenders he’s throwing against.
Do the metrics attempt to adjust for QB talent?
Lol!!!!He hasn't coached a single down yet and he's a fraud? You must be fun at parties...
yeah, let's get Garrett back. I already miss the loser guy.
I hope I never have to say McCarthy Sucks!!you ain't seen noting yet, just wait til the season gets rolling
The issue doesn't seem as simple as that. The same article states the following:
"Prescott also averaged 5.1 fantasy points per game (with a 133.3 passer rating) on play action passes when Elliott was on that field, with those numbers dropping to 1.9 fantasy points per game (and an 83.0 passer rating) during Elliott’s suspension weeks. Perhaps teams didn’t take the threat of play-action as seriously without Elliott on the field, and Prescott’s efficiency suffered as a result."
From the same article:
"On the other end of the spectrum we have four quarterbacks who actually posted a higher passer rating on non-play-action passes. This seemed weird to me, but perhaps the connection is all four passers’ teams also ranked bottom-10 in team rushing attempts over our sample."
Full article: https://www.pff.com/news/fantasy-football-metrics-that-matter-quarterbacks-on-play-action
So McCarthy is right about establishing the run, but it seems like running effectiveness is not as important as run attempts. Also, results vary significantly from team to team and from QB to QB. I am not sure we can call Big Mac a fraud just for this statement. We also can't expect him to spill all the beans on his research. Do you think Bellicheat would willingly tell the media stuff he has found using analytics??
That's a true statement. Mike was 60% pass.
And when he passed 62% went to his WRs, 22% TE and 18% to the RB.
So 102% of his passes went to his WR's, TE's, and RB's? (62+22+18=102). Where did the rest go haha?
Exactly. Belichick has gone on record saying he doesn’t use analytics when everyone knows that’s in fact straight bsThe issue doesn't seem as simple as that. The same article states the following:
"Prescott also averaged 5.1 fantasy points per game (with a 133.3 passer rating) on play action passes when Elliott was on that field, with those numbers dropping to 1.9 fantasy points per game (and an 83.0 passer rating) during Elliott’s suspension weeks. Perhaps teams didn’t take the threat of play-action as seriously without Elliott on the field, and Prescott’s efficiency suffered as a result."
From the same article:
"On the other end of the spectrum we have four quarterbacks who actually posted a higher passer rating on non-play-action passes. This seemed weird to me, but perhaps the connection is all four passers’ teams also ranked bottom-10 in team rushing attempts over our sample."
Full article: https://www.pff.com/news/fantasy-football-metrics-that-matter-quarterbacks-on-play-action
So McCarthy is right about establishing the run, but it seems like running effectiveness is not as important as run attempts. Also, results vary significantly from team to team and from QB to QB. I am not sure we can call Big Mac a fraud just for this statement. We also can't expect him to spill all the beans on his research. Do you think Bellicheat would willingly tell the media stuff he has found using analytics??