visionary
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 28,448
- Reaction score
- 33,407
We'll have to wait and see. Im sure he'll spin it so he can bash the General at the same time. LOL
didnt know australia was in Pakistan
thanx for the geography lesson
We'll have to wait and see. Im sure he'll spin it so he can bash the General at the same time. LOL
didnt know australia was in Pakistan
thanx for the geography lesson
I didnt either.
If you got that from my post, I would say, its too early bro, too early for this
general said plane is in pakistan
youve been defending the general
now possible wreckage found near australia
you saying another poster would try to 'spin' this
you do the math
Also interesting enough this plane was also had emergency signals it is suppose to send out if it crashes in the water and they never activated. There are a lot of weird circumstances with this plane and what happened. I've read a few theories that have the Yemen linked and a reason for the increase in terrorists being hunted within the last week. Also on a radio. Show someone had mentioned that the plane could've been shot down during military exercises and that could be the reason why so many countries rushed to help. I dunno yet what I feel now. I do however am skeptical about the Ping data as imersat has never used their technology to track a plane like that and I find it rather odd that mal won't release the cargo manifest and on the 30th day China magically detected pings with a detector that only detects pings at 600 feet and we have heard anything since about the Chinese and their rogue searches since. So many things don't add up JMo
I havent "defended" the General other than pointing out that blasting him for his speculation is ludicrous based on no other solid evidence. Nobody has done anything but speculate, so criticizing him alone is foolish.
Sounds to me like you math and reading comprehension need some work.
so speculating and labelling someone on "no solid evidence" is OK in your book but saying said satements were baseless is "blasting" and should be defended?
lol
so speculating and labelling someone on "no solid evidence" is OK in your book but saying said satements were baseless is "blasting" and should be defended?
lol
Here's a starting point for you.
When you've got this down, go back and reread what Ive posted and then maybe you can post somewhere near the same zip code.
i swear to god you just make stuff up as you go.