MNF: Seahawks vs Commanders Game Thread

mldardy

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,614
Reaction score
7,312
Lol kick rocks. You don't like Wilson. Too damn bad

Never said I didn't like Wilson. You have me confused with someone else so you can not only kick rocks, you aren't very smart and can't read either. While you are so busy sucking off Seattle/Wilson pay attention to what is going on.

There were clear holding on those TD's called back. Get your freaking eyes checked. Everyone saw that. The announcers, people watching the game, everyone except YOU!
 

kramskoi

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,387
Reaction score
1,765
Well if you are not going to address it and admit i did a good job then you admit that the success Seattle had running the ball was primarily due to poor discipline by the Commanders especially in the first half. Thanks.

I don't see how Unger being hurt and O'Hara not proves your point. Toomer, Boss and a crippled Burress are still better than what the Seahawks have minus Harvin and Miller.

Seattle is also giving up 22.2 ppg this year which is about as mediocre as mediocre can bet at 16th.

It is interesting that you are trying to conflate these 2014 Seahawks with a random Giants team as if it is meaningful. Are you even a Dallas fan?

Yes...you did a good job and I am really a Dallas fan...objective, wary, contemplative and I don't get giddy over the team's success, especially under Garrett. They won only the third game under Romo when they are -2 on turnover differential so maybe they have turned a corner. Your dismissive observations about Seattle's lackluster receiving corp have merit but Wilson still completed 75% of his passes Monday night. If he can continue to do that with his current receiving options, then I hate to see what he can do with a better group. Potent play-action can help create WR separation in not-so-elite receivers. Strong, accurate throwing can make them better as well.

I used the 2007 Giants as a point of emphasis. I could use other teams like the Bucs, Ravens and Steelers, who also relied on bruising defense and running to win Superbowls. There is more to a team than its wide receivers. Points per game, alone, as a measure of defense is a poor metric to use, especially this early in the season. You seem to imply that the Seattle offense is mediocre...I don't share your opinion...the sum is much greater than the parts. This is the same team that just took down Denver, arguably the best team in the league if not for Seattle themselves. A lot of points were lost by Seattle due to penalties. You could call them sloppy, complacent and overconfident, but they are talented enough to overcome more times than not. They have what the Cowboys used to have in the 90's...swagger and bravado. They are playing with the Superbowl hangover but they look perfectly capable of returning as defending champions.

Dallas still has a bit to prove before you put them among the elite, record notwithstanding. Of the top 13 teams, they have had the easiest schedule to date. This team has proven untrustworthy too many times under Garrett. I love that they have finally committed to running the ball and I think Murray holds the key to a successful season. Can they win in Seattle? Possible yes, but not how they played Sunday and certainly not putting up a paltry 3 points in 30 minutes of play. Romo has produced only 2 turnovers in 4 games, so it is safe to say that he is returning to vintage, but the defense is the bottleneck and Seattle will show whether or not it is too tight to take the Cowboys all the places they want to go. At 4-1, they are playing some inspired football right now, and more importantly, have finally developed an identity to be feared.
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
I bet they man Sherman up on Dez, and I'm not sure I'd test him that often in that case, anyway, honestly. There are going to be better matchups available most of the day. I'd rather not risk the turnover.

Re: Garcon and that hair pull, how'd the refs miss the shoving that went on prior to that? It was way past five yards.


Seattle never moves Sherman around. So why would they suddenly change that for Dez? They don't even move him around when they play against Megatron.

Sherman plays one side of the field. The only way they're going to man him up on Dez is when Dallas lines him up to that side. If I was Dallas I'd make the Seahawks pay for the fact that they don't move their best corner to the best WR on the other team. I'd line Williams or Beasely or whoever up on Sherman's side, let him have his shut down stats on those guys, and take my chances with Dez against the other corner or in the slot. I'd like my chances a whole lot, btw, in that case.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Seattle never moves Sherman around. So why would they suddenly change that for Dez? They don't even move him around when they play against Megatron.

Sherman plays one side of the field. The only way they're going to man him up on Dez is when Dallas lines him up to that side. If I was Dallas I'd make the Seahawks pay for the fact that they don't move their best corner to the best WR on the other team. I'd line Williams or Beasely or whoever up on Sherman's side, let him have his shut down stats on those guys, and take my chances with Dez against the other corner or in the slot. I'd like my chances a whole lot, btw, in that case.

Yeah. Don't know what I was thinking when I made that post. I know better. But I meant that I bet they man up on Dez, generally, and don't give him the extra attention other teams give him.
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
Yeah. Don't know what I was thinking when I made that post. I know better. But I meant that I bet they man up on Dez, generally, and don't give him the extra attention other teams give him.


Yeah now that I could see. Which if they man Dez up against those others I really love our chances to get some big plays from Dez.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,859
Yes...you did a good job and I am really a Dallas fan...objective, wary, contemplative and I don't get giddy over the team's success, especially under Garrett. They won only the third game under Romo when they are -2 on turnover differential so maybe they have turned a corner. Your dismissive observations about Seattle's lackluster receiving corp have merit but Wilson still completed 75% of his passes Monday night. If he can continue to do that with his current receiving options, then I hate to see what he can do with a better group. Potent play-action can help create WR separation in not-so-elite receivers. Strong, accurate throwing can make them better as well.

I used the 2007 Giants as a point of emphasis. I could use other teams like the Bucs, Ravens and Steelers, who also relied on bruising defense and running to win Superbowls. There is more to a team than its wide receivers. Points per game, alone, as a measure of defense is a poor metric to use, especially this early in the season. You seem to imply that the Seattle offense is mediocre...I don't share your opinion...the sum is much greater than the parts. This is the same team that just took down Denver, arguably the best team in the league if not for Seattle themselves. A lot of points were lost by Seattle due to penalties. You could call them sloppy, complacent and overconfident, but they are talented enough to overcome more times than not. They have what the Cowboys used to have in the 90's...swagger and bravado. They are playing with the Superbowl hangover but they look perfectly capable of returning as defending champions.

Dallas still has a bit to prove before you put them among the elite, record notwithstanding. Of the top 13 teams, they have had the easiest schedule to date. This team has proven untrustworthy too many times under Garrett. I love that they have finally committed to running the ball and I think Murray holds the key to a successful season. Can they win in Seattle? Possible yes, but not how they played Sunday and certainly not putting up a paltry 3 points in 30 minutes of play. Romo has produced only 2 turnovers in 4 games, so it is safe to say that he is returning to vintage, but the defense is the bottleneck and Seattle will show whether or not it is too tight to take the Cowboys all the places they want to go. At 4-1, they are playing some inspired football right now, and more importantly, have finally developed an identity to be feared.

Oh Garrett. . . . Simplify much?

Still no justification for using SB teams. Try teams the year following a SB win. Like the 2008 Giants, 2002 Bucs. I'm trying to discuss the 2014 Seattle Seahwawks. You are interested in Super Teams. How about using all pro teams or your madden squad?
 
Top