Mo Claiborne or Bobby Wagner?

[BubbleScreen]

Simple question, i was wondering what some of my fellow Cowboys fans thoughts were on this.

If we could do it over again (I know), would you rather move up again to get Mo Claiborne or would you rather keep our picks and take Janoris Jenkins and Bobby Wagner?

My choice would still be the latter.

Reminds me of the time we shouldn't have picked that small college nobody over Shawne Merriman.

Who was that guy again?
:laugh1:

 

[speedkilz88]

This isn't directed at perrykemp, because he obviously knows what's up overall, but this press/press-bail comment keeps getting made, and Kiffin said it basically from his first press conference. But it doesn't sink in for some reason when the issue of the 2013 Dallas Cowboys secondary comes up. I'm not sure why.

Listening to the dc.com shows they also said that the Cowboys couldn't even play press in OTAs because of the cba rules against contact. Yet they said the DL have a lot of contact.

 

[Frozen700]

Nope, I'll continue to criticize the absurdity of the hypothetical.

For example, many have said, "I'd rather have Brockers and Wagner than Mo." Well, that's a silly conclusion because the Rams were high on Brockers, so there is a good possibility they would have traded back a little and still have drafted Brockers. On Wagner, maybe a team would have traded in front of the Cowboys to draft Wagner if the Cowboys were still on the board. This exercise is entirely pointless due to these uncertainties.

People are bored. These "what if" questions, that will never happen are an example of boredom.

This is a classic example of starting a debate, just to start it. No real conclusion to it. Unless there is a time machine, it is pointless.