Twitter: Moose Johnston says the 1992 cowboys would destroy and Patriot team

JustChip

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,315
Reaction score
5,888
Of course but foot note says; two different era's before and free agency

And totally different rules today favoring the offenses.

The interesting thing to do would be to compare the teams position-by-position, including coaches. JJ vs. BB. Aikman vs. Brady, etc. and in the context of today's rules.
 

diefree666

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,529
Reaction score
4,153
And totally different rules today favoring the offenses.

The interesting thing to do would be to compare the teams position-by-position, including coaches. JJ vs. BB. Aikman vs. Brady, etc. and in the context of today's rules.
and to do it right you would also have to look at the context of the rules in 1992 as well.

BUT for talent overall its clear that the 92 boys have it all over any team now. BECAUSE FA and the CAP had not hit yet we had depth that was incredible in addition to near top of the league starters in many positions. You cannot build anything like the old dynasties now. I think the RAMS 2000 team came closest since they had a really fine D to go along with the greatest show on turf.

After that teams were either way over balanced (Ravens, Bucs on D; NO on O) or pretty much balanced as the Pats have usually been. Very good D and O but nothing like the tops D's and O's in the league but balanced enough to win when it matters - especially when you have the Top QB and HC together.
 

JustChip

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,315
Reaction score
5,888
and to do it right you would also have to look at the context of the rules in 1992 as well.

BUT for talent overall its clear that the 92 boys have it all over any team now. BECAUSE FA and the CAP had not hit yet we had depth that was incredible in addition to near top of the league starters in many positions. You cannot build anything like the old dynasties now. I think the RAMS 2000 team came closest since they had a really fine D to go along with the greatest show on turf.

After that teams were either way over balanced (Ravens, Bucs on D; NO on O) or pretty much balanced as the Pats have usually been. Very good D and O but nothing like the tops D's and O's in the league but balanced enough to win when it matters - especially when you have the Top QB and HC together.

The problem with trying to factor in non-free-agency is there is no way to account for what the Patriots would do. Would they assemble the same depth? Maybe. But your point about the 1992 rules is spot on.
 

Aven8

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,424
Reaction score
44,386
TB12 would have gotten destroyed by that Dline. Especially the way they played in that game. What was it 8-9 sacks and like 6 TO's?
 

CouchCoach

Staff member
Messages
41,122
Reaction score
74,954
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Yep, and I'll take the 60's Pack, 70's Boys and Steelers and Vikings, 80's Niners over any Patriots SB team. Since FA, the Pats are just the cutest puppy in an ugly litter.
 

sean10mm

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,024
Reaction score
3,000
Apples and oranges. Different era.

Pretty much. I agree with the basic idea, insofar as no Patriots team could monopolize talent in the salary cap & free agency era like the old Cowboys (and 49ers and Steelers...) teams could. But you start looking deeper and things get weird.

The average player is bigger and stronger now than they were in the early 1990s. It's not a huge difference but it's there. The Cowboys had the cream of the crop from that era, but you can still end up with mismatches that go against them like a 269lb Cowboys center trying to block 350lbs of Vince Wilfork for instance. It's also fair to ask who the hell covers Rob Gronkowski, their strong safety in 1992 was Thomas Everett, who was 5'9". Darren Woodson would be a fun matchup there, but he didn't come into his own as a player until Jimmy Johnson was gone, at which point you've got a Switzer vs. Belichick coaching matchup which is the biggest lol imaginable.

Another wrinkle is the Patriots would be running offensive play concepts that nobody on the Cowboys had ever seen. Probably some coverages they wouldn't recognize immediately, too. The Patriots are used to rules favoring the pass, but what does prime Revis look like if he's allowed to mug the hell out of receivers too? It's hard to root against Irvin (duh) but it's food for thought. A lot of this stuff cuts both ways to some degree.
 

Cowboysheelsreds053

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,375
Reaction score
11,411
Jimmy Johnson was talking over much of the SB XXVII highlights and it was interesting to hear him say how confident they were in that game. He said they watched the film and, while everyone else may have had some doubt, the Cowboys knew they were holding a Royal Flush. All they had to do is lay the cards down one by one, which is exactly what they did. He said the real game was the NFC Championship game. It was interesting to hear him out the game in that context.

Irving use to say they practiced so hard, that gametime was easy.
 
Top