Bobby Carpenter in 2009 gave the team more than Claiborne ever has. He was a busted pick as well in terms of a first rounder, but he at least at some point in the contract had a positive contribution on the football field. Plus, Claiborne cost the 14th and 45th pick and Carpenter only cost the 18th.
Come on, man. That's hyperbole and you know it.
Not sure why you singled out 2009 for Bobby since that was his 4th year. To be fair, you really should compare his first 3 years with Mo's first 3.
But whatever, let's compare Carp's 4 years with us against Mo's 3. Mo has started 25 out of 29 games (~86%) he has appeared in for the Dallas Cowboys. How many starts did we get out of Barbie? Carp started
3 total games out of
58 games that he appeared in for us (~5%).
Sure, you say, but he only started 3 of those games last year. But that had nothing to do with talent. Carp was available for the vast majority of his NFL games but couldn't break the starting lineup despite being the 18th selection.
Oh yeah, and I seem to remember that Mo specifically sealed the game for us last year against St. Louis:
1-10-STL 26 (1:11) (No Huddle, Shotgun)
A.Davis pass deep left intended for B.Quick INTERCEPTED by M.Claiborne at DAL 45. M.Claiborne to DAL 37 for -8 yards (B.Quick).
DALLAS COWBOYSQ4, 1:02
1-10-DAL 37 (1:02) T.Romo kneels to DAL 36 for -1 yards.
2-11-DAL 36
25) T.Romo kneels to DAL 35 for -1 yards.
END GAME
But yeah you're right, never had a positive contribution. Also, you say Carp was "only" picked 18th as though it's so much more than the 14th pick. If I was forced to choose today, I would EASILY pick Mo with the 14th and a 2nd rather than the 3 starts that Carp gave us for the 18th pick.
Sorry bro, I don't mean to attack you or anything, this is really just a general post about how some people are blowing this situation way out of proportion. I know it hurts more because it's very recent, but no way in hell is it the worst pick we've ever made. Not even in the top 5. Even if Mo is cut today.