TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 75,772
- Reaction score
- 70,125
Brilliant.
Do you really wanna debate Sherman vs. Mo?
Stats aren't the end-all-be-all, but they help paint a picture of how a player performs on the field. Mo has demonstrated throughout his career he does not make plays on the ball. Can the same be said about Sherman. Please, try to dispute that, lol?
As to the Burn Rate stat you wanna glom to and try to hang your hat on, please go ahead and tell me why this stat is a reliable indicator when it does not account for poor throws, dropped passes, passes completed out-of-bounds, et cetera.
Consider it a test of intellectual honesty. Go for it.
First off, I didn't compare Sherman to Mo. You brought up what Peters is doing and implied that because Mo doesn't have any INT's or PD's he's not a good player. I brought up the fact that Sherman's stats are 0 PD's and no INT's and asked you a simple question. Is he a bum? He doesn't have any of those stats either.
And I don't want to "glom" anything. I'm not hanging my hat on a burn rate. I'm hanging my hat on what I've seen and its refreshing to see Mo play well and be injury free. He will get better each week hopefully.
See this is the thing. I'm an adult. I'm not one of these children that roots for certain guys to fail or roots for certain guys to win. When I see a player play well I'm happy to see it. I'm happy to see Mo playing well. I'm not going to fine a stat to denounce he's playing well or find one to prove he's playing well. I have far bigger concerns than Mo at this point and it starts with that dreadful defensive line and those linebackers.
And this is so silly. So because qb's throw bad passes that means what exactly? So quarterbacks are only throwing bad passes Mo's way but no other corner in this league? That's moronic. Give up the shtick.