DanteEXT
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,041
- Reaction score
- 2,389
And there will be holes next year. And the year after. While yes, technically it is not the best time to take the QB in the first, it has to be at the back of our minds with every pick.
We are no longer "set" at the position with Romo, although I can all but guarantee you that Jones still thinks this way.
We are at the same crossroads the Packers were with Favre and they took an opportunity when it presented itself. That is the correct mindset.
And you cannot just assign "rounds" to where you start thinking about it seriously. That is what we did with McGee. He went where he "should have" gone, but he could not play.
Teams will be reaching for QBs more and more. We have seen that with people like Ponder and Manuel going in the first round when it is pretty clear they had no business going where they went. You just have to be opportunistic and never think things are right.
Russell Wilson was a headscratcher since the Seahawks just paid a steep price for Flynn. Kaepernick was coming in just as Alex Smith seemed to be getting it.
You just cannot wait thinking you can get someone unless you tank or trade away the draft for people like Griffin.
Similar crossroads, not quite the same. Favre was turning 36 that year I believe and was going into his 15th season in the NFL. And they didn't target Rodgers, he fell into their laps. If a projected top 5 pick QB falls to 16/17 sure, consider it. But don't package picks to move up like the article suggested as something to do.