- Messages
- 62,300
- Reaction score
- 63,985
^This.True, but some will still argue that we lost the GB game due to Murray. Had Murray scored instead of fumbled, we wouldn't have needed that "one stop" at the end. Murray wasn't singularly responsible for the loss, but neither was the defense or any other group on the team. It's a team game and everyone contributed.
I have said this for decades and I will say it again. Football is a simple game. It is a game of execution. Except for rare occasions, the team that executes best wins every time. Execution is about individual players performing their assigned jobs.
The Packers were able to overcome our lead because the offensive players executed their job assignments better than our defense executed theirs. Additionally, the Packers had less difficulty overcoming our lead because our offense did not build upon it due to equally poor execution (and remote refereeing nonsense). An example of poor offensive execution in the game was a lost fumble. A turnover. A lost fumble can deduct six points or -6 points from the scoreboard. An actual rushing touchdown adds positive six points or +6 on the scoreboard.
6 - 6 = 0. Good execution offsetting by poor execution sometimes equals zip for the team at the end of the game.
Last edited: