HTownCowboysFan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,940
- Reaction score
- 71
Cowboysfan22;2071174 said:I think that it was better than Batman begins.
It's a better "popcorn movie" than BEGINS, but BEGINS is a better film.
Cowboysfan22;2071174 said:I think that it was better than Batman begins.
I'll do better when I go see The Hulk. That is, I'll wait until after the credits UNLESS it's as bad or worse that Ang Lee's Hulk. yuck.the kid 05;2086677 said:you should have known to stay after! marvel alwaays done stuff like that. s.h.i.e.l.d. is in it but you have to pay close attention as they first dont call them selfs it...
DallasEast;2087432 said:I'll do better when I go see The Hulk. That is, I'll wait until after the credits UNLESS it's as bad or worse that Ang Lee's Hulk. yuck.
I wouldn't classify it as a 'popcorn movie'. While it wasn't nearly as dramatic as Batman Begins, it was a solid movie, imo. I do agree that Iron Man is not in the same zip code as Batman Begins, which is easily one of the top three or five superhero movie ever made.HTownCowboysFan;2086679 said:It's a better "popcorn movie" than BEGINS, but BEGINS is a better film.
That would be a nice tie-in. I wish that kind of crossover, as small as it may be, would happen in more superhero movies.ChldsPlay;2087441 said:Well I know Robert Downey Jr. has a cameo in The Incredible Hulk, as Tony Stark. I hope it's not just in a post credits clip.
DallasEast;2087450 said:I wouldn't classify it as a 'popcorn movie'. While it wasn't nearly as dramatic as Batman Begins, it was a solid movie, imo. I do agree that Iron Man is not in the same zip code as Batman Begins, which is easily one of the top three or five superhero movie ever made.
Hostile;2093697 said:Went and saw this today. Not a bad super hero movie at all. Afterwards we went to Speed Racer and ended up walking out an hour into it. Save your money on that one.
Hostile;2093697 said:Went and saw this today. Not a bad super hero movie at all. Afterwards we went to Speed Racer and ended up walking out an hour into it. Save your money on that one.
My only regret with Speed Racer was that I didn't leave sooner. 4 minutes into it I already thought it sucked and a half hour into it I told my wife and she agreed. I finally left and 5 minutes later my wife and kids did too. None of us liked it.ChldsPlay;2093802 said:The wife and I really liked Speed Racer. Definitely not something to see if you want a normal run of the mill movie, or anything too serious. Thought it was a lot of fun and continually got better as it went along.
To me, there hasn't been a real "miss" yet this movie season. It's 4/4 with Indy being the closest to failing because of the utter ridiculousness (not just absurd, but absurdly STUPID) of the 2nd half from the monkey scene onward, before that it was pure Indy goodness. I even liked Prince Caspian, and I borderline hated the first Narnia.
The wife and I really liked Speed Racer. Definitely not something to see if you want a normal run of the mill movie, or anything too serious. Thought it was a lot of fun and continually got better as it went along.
The only saving grace for the television series was Bill Bixby, who, bless his soul, was a very talented, but underrated actor, imo. The entire premise of the show was based on The Fugitive. Cut out David Janssen and insert Bill Bixby. Remove Barry Morse and slide in Jack Colvin. Shazam! A total mockery of the comic and a cheap knockoff of the original classic series it was based upon.YoMick;2093729 said:Ironman was good for the first 2/3... lacked imagination for the last 3rd. I think these directors tend to forget.... we want more of the comic book action brought to the screen... well I do anyways...
The end lacked any imagination... two ironmen duking it out. Weak.
It seems "The Incredible Hulk" falls into the same unimagination... the Hulk vs. another Hulk creation...
I think I liked the TV show more with the reporter chasing David Banner around the US.
I hope TDK is lights out... otherwise we have a string of so-so action movies.
DallasEast;2094079 said:The only saving grace for the television series was Bill Bixby, who, bless his soul, was a very talented, but underrated actor, imo. The entire premise of the show was based on The Fugitive. Cut out David Janssen and insert Bill Bixby. Remove Barry Morse and slide in Jack Colvin. Shazam! A total mockery of the comic and a cheap knockoff of the original classic series it was based upon.
Add action scenes such as The Hulk literally straining to lift the back end of a car and it's almost blasphemy what they did to the character. The Hulk is one of the most physically powerful creatures invented in any comic book universe and they downgraded him to a road rage circus strongman!
My apologies for the rant. If not for Bixby, I would have stroked one time too many watching the series. I kept hoping that the series' creators would finally 'get it' and let the character loose, but it never happened. Sad. Ang Lee tried. He got the character right, but his presentation of the story during the movie was too contorted and sloppy. Here's hoping that Ed Norton and company gets it right. ~fingers crossed~
Have you been reading my mind? If you only knew how many times I questioned that very same thing...HTownCowboysFan;2094158 said:^ Man, I loved that show as a kid! But I agree with DE's assessment. And why in the hell was Banner's name "David" on the show and he's "Bruce" in the comics?
I can see that about the series. Even back in the late 70's, network television was a cutthroat business. The network and creators weren't sure that they could capture an audience with a pure comic book theme back then. Instead, they went with The Fugitive clone. From what I can remember, the show was a hit amongst fans of the '60's show it was copied from, so I guess I can't really fault them for going the safe route.YoMick;2094186 said:I hear ya... and thanks for that info....
BUT... my point is.... as a kid watching it... the creators/directors were successful in engaging the audience(it doenst matter what we think now) its the fact that THEN it worked and NOW(todays version) are not IMO