I think that’s a bit of a gamble on Boston’s part. Tatum took a step back last year.
Bill Simmons, whom I enjoy, but is an admitted irrational homer when it comes to Celts thinks/thought Tatum has/had potential MVP type talent which I’ve always thought was hilariously wrong. To me, Tatum potential reminds me of Rudy Gay at his peak (pre-injury).
All that said, didn’t Davis’ agent recently come out and say the Celts better be prepared for just one year of Davis if they traded for him?
He did take a step back. He was much less efficient with his shot selectionlast year. His offensive game is similar to Gays. However, he is already a plus defender and has the ability to be an elite defender. He should be a much better 2 way player than Gay ever was.
He will probably never be tiered as high as Irving is. And what you said about Davis is correct. However ultimately he would have resigned. I think the marriage of Irving/Davis was too much of a gamble for them in terms of roster control. My guess is Irving stays in that scenario. But Irving is somewhat of an unpredictable dude, and a guy that has his own set of values. Thats something Ive come appreciate about him, however that characteristic of his os gonna take him away from my team. Even if they did trade for Davis, Irving may be dead set going back the the NYC area
Boston likely brings back Rozier and evaluates Tatum and Brown in 2019/20. Next year the Grizzlies pick will either convey or become unprotected in the next draft, so I think thats when I think they make any big move. If they can approch 50 wins and the 2nd round of the playoffs with Tatum, Brown, Rozier, Hayward and either Horford or Capella that should give them some ammo. Thats close to the team that went to the ECF last year, but the East is much tougher now