baj1dallas
New Member
- Messages
- 6,556
- Reaction score
- 1
my guess is that he didn't fill out the whole thing the first time for some reason.
jman said:So; they may actually take the highest score if the test is takn more than once.
Chief said:If decision-making is important, then Vince flunked his first test by hiring a lousy agent and walking blindly into the combine.
WoodysGirl said:Now you're just speculating...
And you're wrong on both counts...
You would be right... If it warranted a public explanation, then one would be given. However, this doesn't. And any future discussion about it should be handled via PM.abersonc said:Well it is tough for folks to know. Since the mods won't talk about it.
I for one would like a public explanation. Not counting on it though.
poke said:all i need to know about the Wonderlic as a measure of QB's
is that Quincy had a 30 and Brett Favre had a 22......
as far as I am concerned its useless.
lets give Young a chance to see how good/bad he does
playing before we make our minds up.
poke said:all i need to know about the Wonderlic as a measure of QB's
is that Quincy had a 30 and Brett Favre had a 22......
as far as I am concerned its useless.
lets give Young a chance to see how good/bad he does
playing before we make our minds up.
WoodysGirl said:You would be right... If it warranted a public explanation, then one would be given. However, this doesn't. And any future discussion about it should be handled via PM.
abersonc said:We all better be careful in discussing this issue. Yesterday the mods deleted a similar thread. I suspect they also banned someone.
But they are being very tight lipped about it.
I guess one of them gets annoyed if we suggest Young is stupid.
BigDFan5 said:It was me, I was banned for saying Darren Woodson was ugly
I think I'll fast track that rule to Reality now...boysfanindc said:I think that is OK as long as you don't say Woodson likes guys!
theogt said:16 or 6? Is there much difference? Think about this: Considering the number of 50/50 and multiple choice questions on the practice exam provided by ESPN, someone *should* be able to score in the 12-16 range simply by guessing. So...Young's score, even if its a 16, isn't much more impressive than a 2 year old's.
With that said VY will be a very rich man come draft time and will be a top 5 pick and will be able to prove if he is a "real nfl qb" or not. Question why do you care so much if he made a 6 or not will it affect you putting food on the table?theogt said:16 or 6? Is there much difference? Think about this: Considering the number of 50/50 and multiple choice questions on the practice exam provided by ESPN, someone *should* be able to score in the 12-16 range simply by guessing. So...Young's score, even if its a 16, isn't much more impressive than a 2 year old's.
As for the "argument" that the test doesn't mean anything because it doesn't test "football knowledge" (or whatever term was used), logic is logic and raw intelligence is raw intelligence. There's no distinction between "football intelligence" and other forms of intelligence. They give the test for a reason.