Had a decent argument until the end.
If colleges are paying huge money to market their big name athletes, sell tickets, merchandise, and etc., then in the big culminating event of the year the player just opts out of playing…almost like a breech of contract. I get why the players do it so I’m not bashing them for it, just saying the quality of the bowls are taking a dive outside the BCS series and it’s a bad look that I have to think networks, who pay and make big money off of them are going to want to extract some guarantees that star players will play. Maybe or maybe not it has shown up in the revenues but if more and more keep doing it i have to imagine the networks will fear perception equals reality.
You mean you agreed until it hit too close to home?
Georgia/FSU drew OVER 10 MILLION viewers.
So who exactly is complaining? Advertisers? The Bowl itself?
Nope. Just fans.
With NIL you are definitely onto something. How the deals are structured matter. Final pay outs could be withheld.
But Fall Semester ended December 12/13 for Texas colleges. So they were no longer active students and were free to leave campus and seek other opportunities.
It is the fly in the ointment of D1 football scheduling. BUT it is NOT new.
Kids have been opting out for DECADES to focus on turning pro.
It is happening in greater numbers but good coaches still prepare their team and use that Bowl season to coach up younger kids who will be there next year.
And some kids who just aren't quite good enough to start regularly will get a start or at least get playing time before portalling to a lower-level school.
All net benefits if you ask me.
College football is transitory. Kids will be gone in a blink regardless.
Watch what interests you,
End of day there isn't enough sports media to go around so these advertisers and these eyeballs are not changing direction anytime soon.