Nearly 40% of our salary cap is going to underperformers

[HungryLion]

If you don't understand opportunity cost you can't understand sunk costs.

I like how you look to 2015 where he played 3 and a half games to compare to Dak's entire season of play...

Drives resulting in points doesn't equate to a good drive. You don't beat playoff caliber teams in the NFL kicking field goals.

His inability to keep drives going resulted in the Packers taking control of this game. His early interception in the 3rd quarter didn't help things either.

Yet it’s ok for you to ASSUME that Romo would have played better than Dak in that game. As well as ASSUME he even makes it to that game healthy.

Romo was literally injured for half a season, on 2 straight hits. But we are to believe he could stay healthy for a prolonged super bowl run?

 

[Galian Beast]

Yet it’s ok for you to ASSUME that Romo would have played better than Dak in that game. As well as ASSUME he even makes it to that game healthy.

Romo was literally injured for half a season, on 2 straight hits. But we are to believe he could stay healthy for a prolonged super bowl run?

It wasn't the number of hits that injured Romo it was the manor in which he were hit.

If you think Dak is as good as Romo, you're quite the comedian.

 

[jsb357]

And most of the profit is going to an under-performing GM.

 

[diefree666]

Yet it’s ok for you to ASSUME that Romo would have played better than Dak in that game. As well as ASSUME he even makes it to that game healthy.

Romo was literally injured for half a season, on 2 straight hits. But we are to believe he could stay healthy for a prolonged super bowl run?

he did for years. You once again are guilty of assuming the worst but refusing to admit it