NFL acknowledges two missed calls to NYG

AzorAhai

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,511
Reaction score
8,901
I suspect that the NFL doesn't comment on call not made, unless specifically asked to do so. It's probably only calls that are made or reviewed etc. Just my guess.

I really wish they would just publish a list of blown calls for every game. Transparency will do wonders for fans and give the referee's incentive to do better.
 

mldardy

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,614
Reaction score
7,312
Gotta love this. Wonder if they admit these mistakes had the Giants won. This is pretty ridiculous. The NFL makes me so sick with all these rules, incompetent officiating and excuses like this after the game.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
I would cry for them but no one has ever cried for the Cowboys. Calls get missed in a game. Just as players make mistake, just as coaches make mistake so do Refs. Sucks being human.
 
Messages
10,110
Reaction score
7,328
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Please,,, the NFL front office has already exposed itself as an entity that makes declarations based upon political expediency and public opinion. I've got about as much faith in them as I do the traitors on Capitol Hill.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,036
Reaction score
37,194


I thought the PI was a fair call. DRC grabbed Williams' shoulder and Williams immediately slowed. (Of course, he was slowing to jump for the pass, but the official is just watching for the contact and reaction to the contact.)

I agree that Church held, but he was holding within the numbers within the allowable range for contact. Fells came off like he was blocking for a run and Church latched onto him. Again, if Eli threw it that direction it would have been interference.

I don't understand why teams are allowed to release these acknowledgements. If the league is going to allow it, the NFL should just release all of them since all teams have refuted calls.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
Daniel Fells was not held. He was run blocking Church. Thus Church thought it was a run play at first. Daniel Fells kept on with this run blocking. Thus its not holding on Church and should have been a no call.

That is exactly how I saw it. Fells was blocking like there was no way Eli would throw the ball. He was just as shocked as the rest of us when he actually threw it.

I thought the PI on TWill was a terrible call. I didn't see any "turning of the shoulder", barely any contact.
 

JDSmith

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,273
Reaction score
5,680
I thought the PI on TWill was a terrible call. I didn't see any "turning of the shoulder", barely any contact.

I thought that one was terrible too. But I felt we got screwed when either Dez mysteriously forgot how to jump or the DB was holding him down on the first drive. Both penalties would put us at the goal line, so it's a wash.
 

sbark

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,214
Reaction score
4,408
If NYG want to see what referees costing a team a game looks like, they should go watch the Dal vs GB game last season. Until then they can shove it.

referees had the call correct on the field...........it was the NFL front office that called by NYC with "advice" on the replay call........
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,983
Reaction score
48,730
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I suspect that the NFL doesn't comment on call not made, unless specifically asked to do so. It's probably only calls that are made or reviewed etc. Just my guess.

Except they mentioned the no-call with Fells.

What gets me is that they missed multiple calls that should have gone in Dallas' favor. Yet no mention...or at least not yet.
 

Derinyar

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,231
Reaction score
959
I thought the PI was a fair call. DRC grabbed Williams' shoulder and Williams immediately slowed. (Of course, he was slowing to jump for the pass, but the official is just watching for the contact and reaction to the contact.)

I agree that Church held, but he was holding within the numbers within the allowable range for contact. Fells came off like he was blocking for a run and Church latched onto him. Again, if Eli threw it that direction it would have been interference.

I don't understand why teams are allowed to release these acknowledgements. If the league is going to allow it, the NFL should just release all of them since all teams have refuted calls.

I'd argue that the PI was a ticky tack call with the way they were calling the game. They let Dez be tackled before the ball got there in the end zone without a call. If that's not DPI nothing is.
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
They're trying to make Mara feel better about Brady.
 

ThrowuptheXDez88

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,447
Reaction score
454
This is ridiculous that reporters even put this crap out there.. Dez couldn't jump b/c he was blanketed by the Prince kid, Romo was blocked in the back & the Giants should've had the ball at the 15.. Moore clearly hits Romo well after he releases the football on the first play of the game winning drive..
 

Floatyworm

The Labeled One
Messages
23,023
Reaction score
21,203
Did it acknowledge that Dez was held down by Amukamara? Or that Mincey was being held on every play? I'd say the bad calls more than evened out.

Re-watched the game last night......and for sure Mincey was getting mugged. Especially when they ran a twist...and he was the DE coming inside....Pugh was late on the switch just about everytime....and was holding on for dear life. Yet.....not even 1 holding call.
 

Derinyar

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,231
Reaction score
959
Did they acknowledge that ODBj fumbled before he was down?

But he hadn't become a runner! What ever the hell that means. I'm guessing it means that the NFL can call plays like that how the hell ever they want to.
 
Top