NFL.com: Ted Ginn, Jr. to Work Out April 12

Don't sleep on Jarrett. The guy continously made plays for a big time program.

He's not a burner, but with his vertical jump and wingspan, he'll be tough to defend in the red zone.
 
Avery;1439477 said:
Don't sleep on Jarrett. The guy continously made plays for a big time program.

He's not a burner, but with his vertical jump and wingspan, he'll be tough to defend in the red zone.

Thats what they said about Mike Williams and his 30 TD's in 2 years. Most of them being Endzone fades.
 
McCordsville Cowboy;1439486 said:
Thats what they said about Mike Williams and his 30 TD's in 2 years. Most of them being Endzone fades.

All I'm saying is just because they share the same school and the same measurable doesn't mean he'll be a bust.

Penn St. RB's may not have had a lot of success in the NFL, but Larry Johnson has done okay.

Sometimes we forget about players simply due to a slower than normal 40 when they did nothing but get the job done in college. I could live with Ginn, Bowe, Meacham or Jarrett at #22.
 
I think every time someone mentions Mike Williams, I'll just throw out Larry Fitzgerald's name, because he ran a 4.63 at the Combine, but was taken very high because of his college production. That seemed to work out pretty well.
 
The Realist;1439518 said:
Anquan Boldin 4.72?
Yeah, but he was a late 2nd rounder. I think the point was taking a chance on a guy like that in the 1st.
 
McCordsville Cowboy;1439450 said:
Mike Williams ran a 4.55 at his workout.

So essentially Dwayne Jarret is 2007 Keyshawn Johnson without the hands.

No thanks.
Since when does Jarrett have bad hands?
 
Jarrett's time is really a blessing. He has a chance to be there at 22 now. If we pass on him it will be a mistake. He will be the best WR in the draft not named Calvin Johnson. I see the value in Ginn for his return skills, but as a WR Jarrett is the choice.
 
if we trade down to the very early 2nd and pick up a very early 3rd Jarret might still be there.. then hes great value.. as the 35th pick lets say but at 22 i dont think so
 
BLT;1439552 said:
if we trade down to the very early 2nd and pick up a very early 3rd Jarret might still be there.. then hes great value.. as the 35th pick lets say but at 22 i dont think so
He's great value at 22...IMO we should not try and get cute. If he is there you take him.
 
jobberone;1439564 said:
I can see jumping on Ginn at 22 but not Jarrett. It's just too risky.
I don't see the risk. Ginn is more of a risk due to injuries IMO, but then we all have our own opinions. I just really think that Jarrett is going to be good from the get go.
 
I think this is great news! He could fall right to our pick, and I would love that.

I don't care what anyone says about his speed, Jarrett is a baller, period. I watched almost every game of his since his freshman year, this kid has worked so hard to develop, and it showed this year big time. I think he could be our next "playmaker".

If Jarrett had ran a 4.4 then he would be right there with C.J. IMO. We all knew he isn't a burner, that's not his game, he has plenty football speed , and he really knows how to use his body. Jarretts' athletiscsm and hands are unbeleivable.

I don't see how anybody who has actually watched Jarrett play several games this season could not be drooling at the thought of having him.

The Mike Williams comparisons are rediculous, they are very different body types. BMW is thick and heavy, Jarrett is lean quick and could take a quarter of the top of a backboard and leave change. Jarrets hands are in the Roy Williams (DET) league.
 
You have to compare him to the likes of Bowe and Meachem and he frankly doesn't match up.
 
Balls in the air and the receiver has to run 10-40 yards to go get it......

Who do you want....

Bowe and his 4.51

or

Jarrett and his 4.62-4.67

I'll take Jarrett every time. Football speed.
 
Tristan;1439581 said:
If Jarrett had ran a 4.4 then he would be right there with C.J. IMO.

Well, I wouldn't go that far, I just think people focus too much on the underwear olympics and a few drills than the actual game.

It's the reason guys like Emmitt Smith go to #17.
 
speedkilz88;1439596 said:
Bowe and Meachem get separation in man coverage, Jarrett doesn't.
Somehow despite getting separation he put up better numbers all through his career at USC. He must be an anomoly.
 
speedkilz88;1439596 said:
Bowe and Meachem get separation in man coverage, Jarrett doesn't.

Among Jarrett's 41 TD catches, how many were man vs zone?

And if you could break that down a little further were they vs press coverage, off man, cover 2, cover 3, etc, etc.

Please enlighten us.
 
Back
Top