NFL Draft Countown Mock Updated

[Rack]

Ok, well name a quarter. I'll look at every play in that quarter and tell you the lineup on every play.

I don't have the game recorded, Tom.


How about this, start with the first quarter and work your way to the 4th quarter. If you don't see it, then you don't understand the defenses they were running.

 

[theogt]

I don't have the game recorded, Tom.


How about this, start with the first quarter and work your way to the 4th quarter. If you don't see it, then you don't understand the defenses they were running.

You either didn't watch the game or you dont' know what a 46 defense is.

It's amazing that someone so fortunate to play semi-pro football rolleyes knows so little about the game.

 

[DallasCowpoke]

Ok Rack, now you go.......

:beer1:

 

[Rack]

You either didn't watch the game or you dont' know what a 46 defense is.

It's amazing that someone so fortunate to play semi-pro football rolleyes knows so little about the game.

Yeah, I didn't record the game, so.. that means I "know so little about the game"?


The only thing worse then your football knowledge is your ability to insult someone. In the end though, you suck at both.


Lets see, without looking at any video, tell me what defense the Saints were in on the Eagles' second play of their possession of the second quarter...





Tommy, if you weren't so full of yourself and actually opened your mind up to new information, you might actually learn a thing or two about the game.

 

[theogt]

Lets see, without looking at any video, tell me what defense the Saints were in on the Eagles' second play of their possession of the second quarter...

I didn't watch the game closely, so I'm not aware (I was working). You see, there is difference here, though. If I had claimed that they were running a certain defense on that play, you might have a point. You claimed that the Ravens ran a 46 defense in the playoff game. I asked you to give me a single quarter in which they ran a 46 defense. You can't. You don't know if they ran it at all -- either because (1) you didn't watch the game, (2) you don't know what a 46 defense is, or (3) you're simply lying.

Unless you can name a play or a quarter in which they used a 46 defense in that game, you shouldn't claim that they did. In other words, be able to back yourself up when you make questionable statements. You never are able to do so and it makes you look like a blowhard.

 

[McCordsville Cowboy]

I didn't watch the game closely, so I'm not aware (I was working). You see, there is difference here, though. If I had claimed that they were running a certain defense on that play, you might have a point. You claimed that the Ravens ran a 46 defense in the playoff game. I asked you to give me a single quarter in which they ran a 46 defense. You can't. You don't know if they ran it at all -- either because (1) you didn't watch the game, (2) you don't know what a 46 defense is, or (3) you're simply lying.

Unless you can name a play or a quarter in which they used a 46 defense in that game, you shouldn't claim that they did. In other words, be able to back yourself up when you make questionable statements. You never are able to do so and it makes you look like a blowhard.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/blowhard

 

[theogt]

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/blowhard

Point? He goes around making ridiculous claims and touting his expertise (because he played...wait for it....semi-pro football) without backing anything up, and insults anyone that disagrees with him. In my neck of the woods, we call those types blowhards.

 

[Rack]

I didn't watch the game closely, so I'm not aware (I was working). You see, there is difference here, though. If I had claimed that they were running a certain defense on that play, you might have a point. You claimed that the Ravens ran a 46 defense in the playoff game. I asked you to give me a single quarter in which they ran a 46 defense. You can't. You don't know if they ran it at all -- either because (1) you didn't watch the game, (2) you don't know what a 46 defense is, or (3) you're simply lying.

Unless you can name a play or a quarter in which they used a 46 defense in that game, you shouldn't claim that they did. In other words, be able to back yourself up when you make questionable statements. You never are able to do so and it makes you look like a blowhard.

I saw them run a 46. Sorry I didn't pull out a notepad and a pen and write down what quarter they were in and how much time was left when I happened. If I had the power to see into the future I would of known you would of wanted that info and would of wrote it down just for you, Tommy.


Don't be an idiot. I don't have to name the exact time they came out in a 46. You're just being dumb now, Tommy.

 

[Rack]

Point? He goes around making ridiculous claims and touting his expertise (because he played...wait for it....semi-pro football) without backing anything up, and insults anyone that disagrees with him. In my neck of the woods, we call those types blowhards.

I've never said I know more about the game because I played semi-pro football. Just cuz I happen to know more about the game then you (and that's not saying much) and played semi-pro football (by the way, we ran a 46 two seasons ago) doesn't mean the reason I know more then you is because I played semi-pro football.

The amount of football knowledge I had as a sophomore in high school would of been plenty (compared to yours now).


If you really think criticizing me cuz I don't know the exact moment in the game the Ravens ran a 46 is gonna "stick" then you're more clueless then I previously thought (and that IS saying a lot).

 

[theogt]

I've never said I know more about the game because I played semi-pro football. Just cuz I happen to know more about the game then you (and that's not saying much) and played semi-pro football (by the way, we ran a 46 two seasons ago) doesn't mean the reason I know more then you is because I played semi-pro football.

The amount of football knowledge I had as a sophomore in high school would of been plenty (compared to yours now).


If you really think criticizing me cuz I don't know the exact moment in the game the Ravens ran a 46 is gonna "stick" then you're more clueless then I previously thought (and that IS saying a lot).

See? Blowhard.

 

[Rack]

See? Blowhard.

What a great contribution.

You didn't even reply to my post. Not surprising.

 

[McCordsville Cowboy]

I've never said I know more about the game because I played semi-pro football. Just cuz I happen to know more about the game then you (and that's not saying much) and played semi-pro football (by the way, we ran a 46 two seasons ago) doesn't mean the reason I know more then you is because I played semi-pro football.

The amount of football knowledge I had as a sophomore in high school would of been plenty (compared to yours now).


If you really think criticizing me cuz I don't know the exact moment in the game the Ravens ran a 46 is gonna "stick" then you're more clueless then I previously thought (and that IS saying a lot).

Semi Pro is fun.. If you are still young enough and in decent shape it can be a blast. I play for the Conneticut Thunder and we are playing in the Alamo Dome on Feb 2nd. I wish we ran the 46 but personnel dicates a 3-4.. Too many big linebackers with speed and too many DT's...