Beats_By_Zeke
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,284
- Reaction score
- 2,451
I'm I the only one who wants to know what else was talked about in this meeting?
Talking about killing? Y'all experts? Y'all know about killing? I'd like to hear about it, potheads.
That's surprising tbh. I just looked it up and they have 4 random tests throughout the season, but none in the off season. I woulda thought there would be many more suspensions in the NBA with rumors of more than 2/3rds to be users; something smells there.NBA still tests for it, dunno about MLB but I don't think I've heard of an MLB player being suspended for pot.
It's a quote from the movie "Platoon".What on earth does this mean
Evidently you never seen platoon.What on earth does this mean
That's surprising tbh. I just looked it up and they have 4 random tests throughout the season, but none in the off season. I woulda thought there would be many more suspensions in the NBA with rumors of more than 2/3rds to be users; something smells there.
lol...Sgt Barnes!!Talking about killing? Y'all experts? Y'all know about killing? I'd like to hear about it, potheads.
key words lol
"For now, though, it appears that dramatic changes aren’t coming, on any of those points."
So jerry planted a seed, which may grow, but it will take time.
Exactly...and while I am not on the "pro-pot" agenda (I actually don't really care for it, the lingering smell especially...and the same goes for cigarettes), it definitely seems like a slippery slope to regulate it as the league does when it is essentially on a path to U.S.-wide legalization. Couple that with the billions in alcohol sales the league is behind (directly and indirectly), which is the country's leading consumed drug (I don't drink bourbon or other whiskeys merely for the taste but also because of the way it makes me feel) AS WELL AS the league's absolute criminal overprescribing of narcotics and related pain killers and what you have is an untenable and indefensible position, expressing an hipocrisy that knows no bounds.Yes, the business says that.
That's why they are trying to change the rules.
Most jobs that compensate their players very well do not force their employees to take random drug tests for marijuana.
Amen. Its time to get real and let people live.Exactly...and while I am not on the "pro-pot" agenda (I actually don't really care for it, the lingering smell especially...and the same goes for cigarettes), it definitely seems like a slippery slope to regulate it as the league does when it is essentially on a path to U.S.-wide legalization. Couple that with the billions in alcohol sales the league is behind (directly and indirectly), which is the country's leading consumed drug (I don't drink bourbon or other whiskeys merely for the taste but also because of the way it makes me feel) AS WELL AS the league's absolute criminal overprescribing of narcotics and related pain killers and what you have is an untenable and indefensible position, expressing an hipocrisy that knows no bounds.
I am not saying you are wrong...far from it. Gregory is a kid and his punishment should have fit his crime. ln the real world the public wouldn't have even heard about it. What he did was what many, many young people do everyday and was blown way out of any logical proportion.They shouldn't test for weed. It's ridiculous.
That being said, Randy Gregory doesn't deserve to be in the NFL.
He showed this organization such complete and utter disrespect by being unable to pass a simple drug test.
They spend a premium draft pick, along with millions of dollars, and you care that little about holding up your side of the deal.
Randy Gregory lacks character, maturity, and self control. I wouldn't want him on my team.
is he basically saying "we all have to deal with this, so why make the players accountable for a job"?
The players will stand there during contracts and say "this is business" Okay it is, business says you cant smoke weed and you get compensated very well for it" Why have any standards at some point?