NFL Network Top Ten Meltdowns - Romo number 9

[Yeagermeister]

:laugh2:

I know. That has got to be some sort of record.

Some of Hos' replies to edunce and Nors might be longer but I doubt it. :laugh2:

 

[Yeagermeister]

The funny thing is that I read RedRaiderCowboysFan's post more than once and kept asking myself, "Should I or shouldn't I?" I said the same thing to myself after CowboyMike replied to him. Then I finally decided, "Oh. What the heck. I hadn't written a manifesto in a long time anyway." :

I didn't think a coon arse like you could string together a paragraph much less a whole page. :laugh2:

 

[DallasEast]

I didn't think a coon arse like you could string together a paragraph much less a whole page. :laugh2:

Be wery wery quiet! I'm hunting yeager meisters! heh heh heh!

 

[Yeagermeister]

Be wery wery quiet! I'm hunting yeager meisters! heh heh heh!

http://img.***BLOCKED***/albums/v628/cowboyszone/thread_stuff/duck_season.gif

 

[DallasEast]

http://img.***BLOCKED***/albums/v628/cowboyszone/thread_stuff/duck_season.gif

http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/Youaredespicable.png

 

[CoCo]

If we could create a parallel universe I would endorse letting those with serious Romo gripes take their version of the team off into their own universe and get busy finding his replacement.

I am more than willing to cast my lot with Romo but I honestly feel bad at times for the ridiculous lack of support the guy gets for rescuing this team from its pathetic doldrums in 2006.

There's a lot better chance the next QB hunt turns up another Drew Bledsoe than Tony Romo. If that 2006 season wasn't a stark enough contrast for people I don't know what it will take.

That said I am all for affordable depth at every position and if any Dallas QB proves themselves superior to Romo I will throw my support 100% behind them. FWIW, I don't see that happening until Romo starts to show significant erosion of physical skills which I hope isn't for another 6 years or so.

 

[dadymat]

No, I am not arguing that, to this point, Campbell has been a better QB than Romo. Your assumption is off the mark.

However, the future MAY (stress: MAY) hold something different. Campbell has changed systems often. With a second year in the WCO, he may go downfield much more this year. It took Favre and Hasselbeck a few years each to master the WCO; Campbell so far has had only one.

Further, Campbell is young and has upside for improvement. The future Campbell therefore may be much better than the past Campbell.

But the argument began over a "top-five qb" distinction. When making that distinction, future hopes do not count, only past performance. In this light I would be hard-pressed to argue that Campbell is better than Romo, so I am not arguing that.

such fail......

 

[Skinsmaniac]

such fail......

At reading comprehension?