bsbellomy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,455
- Reaction score
- 3,210
I understand what you're telling me and appreciate the guidance. But what the NFL wants isn't particularly interesting to me, as I think that is quite transparent. I am interested in the reasons folks are arguing that somehow Elliott's public defense must not in any way "shame" his accuser. Must he then accept his "shame" as the price of... of I am not quite certain.
So you don't care what the NFL wants in his response but you do care how they feel how they care about his current response? The NFL is basically saying, "we have this info already and releasing it for public consumption is doing nobody any good. Bring us new info that responds to our findings".
EDIT: I re-read your post and I guess you're concern is the reaction here about how Zeke's response can be considered shaming? I'm with you there I don't see one shred of shaming in his response. I think only the people that already have their minds made up are saying that though.
Last edited: