NeonNinja
Dash28
- Messages
- 17,294
- Reaction score
- 15,038
he's not going to be suspended, not a big deal of a play..
Yeah, good talk.
he's not going to be suspended, not a big deal of a play..
What's more shocking:
A) That Suh would do such a thing?
B) That 90% of the fans on here say they want Suh as a Cowboy next year?
I think those fans should be suspended.
why are you always so contrarian for the sake of being contrarian?
If Suh ends up NOT GETTING SUSPENDED, you owe me a "Cowboys Run the East" Tshirt. Okay thank you goodbye.
because I'm not a complete BLIND HOMER especially over a nothing play that happpens a dozwn times a game...would say the exact same thing if it was a cowboy player
Question about an appeal....would that just apply to a fine? How would it be fair to the Cowboys to have a decision today that Suh is suspended, spend the week preparing a game plan to take most advantage of his absence and then be told Saturday (for example) that Suh has been re-instated upon appeal???
where's the intent, he wasn't even looking at Rodgers, his back was towards, so unless he has eyes in the back of his head to know where Rodgers ankle was exactly as he was stepping back to steady himself, then it's a nothing play....
His intent was CLEAR. If someone grabs your leg, you would normally react to that and look back. That is, unless you are INTENTIONALLY pretending to ignore them. That's proof enough from this DIRTY player.
you are so full of crapbecause I'm not a complete BLIND HOMER especially over a nothing play that happpens a dozwn times a game...would say the exact same thing if it was a cowboy player