Yobwocs
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,754
- Reaction score
- 3,874
As they mentioned, the staffs of the Athletic (considered one the best staffs) had him 12th, which is not terrible at all. And ESPN's staff--not the level of the Athletic, but still ok--had him 10th.
That 10-12 range dounds pretty fair and is generally where he falls. I think he was evn in about tat range in the NFL networks top 100 (though that can silly at times).
I happen to disagree. Most of the rankings I see have him on average ranked around #7-9. Some of them ranks him higher than that, some of them ranks him lower, depends on the metric they use. Some metrics even have him as #1 (Football Insiders), but I definitely think on average he's higher than #10-12.
I can agree Brees, Mahomes, and Wilson are better. Brady, Ben, Ryan, and Rodgers are getting old imo. I don't think Jackson's passing talents are good enough to consistently have the type of season he had last year but I might be wrong. And I see Watson as more or less equal to Dak. Both are 10 win per year QBs on average, and both have a 1-2 Playoff record - but Dak has almost double the sample size. I'd place Dak slightly higher because I think he elevates the team more.
Last edited: