It’s the players assoc idea. I’m guessing it gives them more consecutive days off as opposed to OTA then coming back for camp. If you are getting the same number of days having them consecutive right before the season might be more productive
Certainly true, but in the cases when it’s a new scheme, you’re missing 6-8 weeks to mentally absorb what they learned in OTAs before camp.
Probably not a big deal, but these guys get paid by playing well and earning it. Don’t see how the Union feels as if they are helping their members this way, but maybe the overall sentiment is the veteran players don’t want to be bothered. Although if that’s the case, a longer camp is the trade off. Doesn’t seem to add up…but again, I’m sure there’s plenty I’m missing.
Jeez if anything camp feels like it’s a little long as is. The way I see it (and they do not at all ask me lol), I’d keep rookie camp and mandatory OTAs as is, eliminate the voluntary nonsense, shorten camp by at least a few days, and institute common practice that starters play one half of one preseason game.
Maybe we can get back to hitting the ground running again when the games actually count….but that is absolutely a fan’s point of view, and we will always be last to be considered, although we are the people that fund the entire thing.
I gotta go yell at a cloud.