NFL's hardest hitter per NFL Live

[yazzmode621]

You won't find it. He said he'd comply with the rule. You're speaking without knowing jack.

We'll have to wait and see.

 

[yazzmode621]

Roy doesn't do it on a normal basis, show me 2 consecutive games at any point in his career where he's horse-collared someone, for the illiterate, that means 2 weeks, back-to-back, where the horse-collar was imposed by ROy Williams, you won't be able to

and there were at least 4 players who horse-collared someone after the rule was implemented last year, and who weren't flagged, or fined, and none of those instances were Roy Williams

You should really learn what a word means(illiterate) before you start using it in a sentence.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

I cant call it a punk move because he did it right in front of his face so he wasnt being a punk.

I can, cuz only punks spit in people's faces

And for the last time, I dont consider it dirty because to me a dirty player is a player who cheats in any which way he can TO GAIN AN ADVANTAGE.

there aren't 2 sets of dirty players, there is just one, so whatever is dirty, goes along the same lines and makes a player dirty, breaking the rules to gain an advantage (which Roy hasn't done) spitting, kicking below the belt, grabbing, are all dirty, so ST because he spit on a player is a dirty player, he isn't dirty for horse-collaring, because he hasn't done it after the rule banning it has been implemented, neither has Roy WIlliams, but he is a dirty player for spitting on someone

Also, TO's problems being about money are totally false.

no it's not, remember his famous, "my children have to eat"? it wasn't about getting balls in Philly, he caught 90+ before he started on his rant, it may have been about something else in San Fran, most likely tired of losing and Coach Mariucci being such a puss, but mostly it's been about money, and now he's getting it, and we'll be seeing a very behaved TO for awhile

 

[Hostile]

ST spitting on Pittman's face was a stupid, thuggish move. I cant call it a punk move because he did it right in front of his face so he wasnt being a punk. And for the last time, I dont consider it dirty because to me a dirty player is a player who cheats in any which way he can TO GAIN AN ADVANTAGE.

So if I spit in your face and you can see me doing it I'm not a Punk and you won't consider it dirty?

Yeah right.

 

[yazzmode621]

Oh oh, now I'm being shouted at in all caps. Sure sign of defeat.

Actually it has everything to do with being tough. The sissified version of the game is for lace panties.

I'm not shouting. I'm just making sure you dont skim over it and you actually read it.

No it doesnt. The lace panties is getting old, old man.

 

[superpunk]

For the record, I have never spit at anyone....

And your lies about me hurt.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

You should really learn what a word means(illiterate) before you start using it in a sentence.

illiterate means people who can't read and/or comprehend, I made sure I dumbed it down so you could get it

 

[Hostile]

I think you are.

If you look at that play you can see how he tries to hurt him. For the last time: He could've taken him down even just by doing a normal horse collar but he grabs on to him, sets himself in perfect position and DRAGS him down. Anyone(other than Cowboys fans) can see that he had malicious intent.

LOL

Yeah and I'm so critical of some Cowboys players that people here call me a hater.

You're out of your league son. You should drop it before you lose all credibility. Oh wait...


...long gone already.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

LOL

Yeah and I'm so critical of some Cowboys players that people here call me a hater.

You're out of your league son. You should drop it before you lose all credibility. Oh wait...


...long gone already.

yeah, I think credibility and logic waived bye-bye to him, a loooong time ago

 

[yazzmode621]

and we've established that Taylor does, indeed, perform that cheap move.

So, logically, that would make Taylor (by your criteria) a ______ player.

can anyone fill in this blank for me? Or am I living in some parallel universe where the laws of logic no longer apply?

You havent established that Taylor does it on a regular basis and also he does it to hurt people.

BTW, when you put up that video and pointed out the moments where Taylor had performed a horse collar, you were wrong.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

You havent established that Taylor does it on a regular basis and also he does it to hurt people.

you haven't done that for Roy either

you've picked sporadic examples, but nothing that indicates that this is a regular occurence, and noone can establish what the intent was, only the person who does it can

 

[superpunk]

You havent established that Taylor does it on a regular basis and also he does it to hurt people.

BTW, when you put up that video and pointed out the moments where Taylor had performed a horse collar, you were wrong.

Just as predicted....

Isn't it about time this was ended?

This gem of a poster hasn't brought anything of value to the discussion for QUITE some time - just the same tired crap over and over again. He can read Williams' mind. When shown clear evidence of Taylor pulling guys down backwards (horse-collar) he claims he also knows Taylor didn't intend to hurt them, and that anyways - they're not ACTUAL horse collar tackles in the first place.

Give me an ****** break.

Someone perform the mercy killing. This is trolling at it's most pathetic.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Someone perform the mercy killing. This is trolling at it's most pathetic.

ignore button punkyboy?

 

[superpunk]

BTW.....

I can only assume e is watching the highlight video, and coming up with reasons why Taylor is NOT horse-collaring people.

I can see the future.

I expect worship. And virgins.

 

[yazzmode621]

I can, cuz only punks spit in people's faces



there aren't 2 sets of dirty players, there is just one, so whatever is dirty, goes along the same lines and makes a player dirty, breaking the rules to gain an advantage (which Roy hasn't done) spitting, kicking below the belt, grabbing, are all dirty, so ST because he spit on a player is a dirty player, he isn't dirty for horse-collaring, because he hasn't done it after the rule banning it has been implemented, neither has Roy WIlliams, but he is a dirty player for spitting on someone



no it's not, remember his famous, "my children have to eat"? it wasn't about getting balls in Philly, he caught 90+ before he started on his rant, it may have been about something else in San Fran, most likely tired of losing and Coach Mariucci being such a puss, but mostly it's been about money, and now he's getting it, and we'll be seeing a very behaved TO for awhile

A punk to me is someone who attacks someone behind their backs or they attack someone knowing they wont be retaliated on. Therefore I dont consider him a punk.

So now Taylor also kicks below the belt? Yea ok. Whatever you say. And spitting on a player does not let you gain an advantage(unless if you spit in his eyes during the middle of a play and temporarily blind him which Taylor DID NOT do).

And once again we have another Cowboys fan in denial. TO had MANY more issues than just money. If you dont wanna admit that then that's your problem. Not mine.

 

[superpunk]

ignore button punkyboy?

Don't take that tone with me.

I can read minds.

 

[Hostile]

I'm not shouting. I'm just making sure you dont skim over it and you actually read it.

No it doesnt. The lace panties is getting old, old man.

I have read every word you've said. Most weren't worth the flush, but that's to be expected.

All caps is considered shouting. By all means go ask at ES if you don't believe it.

I may be old but I'm way ahead of you.

 

[yazzmode621]

So if I spit in your face and you can see me doing it I'm not a Punk and you won't consider it dirty?

Yeah right.

No I would consider you something else that I am not allowed to say because it would violate the rules.

 

[5Stars]

No I would consider you something else that I am not allowed to say because it would violate the rules.

Why don't you tell us how old you are? That might be the reason your so stupid...

Are you Sean Taylor's chick?

:dissskin: (good dog, Gibbs...)

 

[Bob Sacamano]

A punk to me is someone who attacks someone behind their backs or they attack someone knowing they wont be retaliated on. Therefore I dont consider him a punk.

to me, someone who spits in someone's face is a punk, I don't give a crap what your interpretation is

So now Taylor also kicks below the belt? Yea ok. Whatever you say. And spitting on a player does not let you gain an advantage(unless if you spit in his eyes during the middle of a play and temporarily blind him which Taylor DID NOT do).

reading comprehension, it's wonderful, you should try it

I did not say Taylor kicks below the belt, it was an example of a dirty player that I gave you, and breaking the rules to gain an advantage was ANOTHER example of a dirty player, trying to show you that there is only one interpretation of a dirty player, that everything dirty goes into the phrase, dirty player

is that dumbed down enough for you igor?

And once again we have another Cowboys fan in denial. TO had MANY more issues than just money. If you dont wanna admit that then that's your problem. Not mine.

how am I in denial? I said that TO was acting like an idiot, but I know it was mainly about money, and he's getting it, so he should be on his best behavior for awhile

dont' know what ST's problem is though, I have a good idea, that he's an idiot, but whatever