Do you remember that Detroit game? There were a ton of blown calls against the Cowboys. I would say that in the first 3 quarters there were many calls against us. But in the fourth quarter the refs missed that call against Detroit and that is what gets all the press. You probably won't believe me because you seem to have an agenda on this topic but that's fine. I am not sure if the game day threads still live somewhere but go check them out.
Your link states that "The NFL has reportedly admitted..." Well, it turns out they did not admit anything. The NFL was quick to deny this rumor.
See the update section on the link below:
https://cowboyswire.usatoday.com/20...-error-in-cowboys-penalty-in-loss-to-packers/
So it turns out it was not so easy to find this example huh? Maybe you are the one helping me make my point? Before finding an actual apology to the Cowboys, you have found an admission of a blown call against us and rumor that the NFL admitted a mistake against us. For a second you should consider that I am actually right about this specific point?
I saw you started to bring up the fact that these apologies to our opponents work against me. You should reconsider this approach. This would be true if the NFL apologized for every single bad call. That way we could use this as a statistic to see if they refs are biased against us, but the NFL only makes statements about a small percentage of bad calls. If they only publicly discuss 1% of these calls, then that does not tell you anything about how our team has been impacted by the other 99% of bad calls. Maybe if we had data on the other 99% we could discuss this topic. My point is about how the NFL handles the 1% of the calls they discuss publicly. I just find it odd that it is so hard for them to admit mistakes against us. Not only that but sometimes they double down just to prove their point (Dez catch). But hey, maybe you will prove me wrong one day with your research skills!