No excuses for the Vikings

[starfan1]

It's important because even the Packers, when 14 pts down and only a quarter and a half left to play stayed with the run.
It's still important because it's probably (along with stopping our running game) the best way at beating us.

I agree but its not important on a message board. Which really is the krux of OP issue. He dont like that people clarify the truth of what happened.

 

[jazzcat22]

Just as puzzling as members disappearing after a loss.

My theory is after a win or a loss as to some staying off the forum for a day or two is that they know what is coming.
And sometimes they just don't want to read the onslaught of the good or the bad. Maybe they just don't want to respond, or be called out.

Dak has a great game, the Dak dislikers go away. Some come in and say he played great. Dak has a bad game and they are in full force, and many do not want to put up with all the negativity.
Some will read but do not respond, as they know the consequences. Others will respond. And it works the opposite way also.

We all know the drill. And some just want to argue at times and sometimes they don't.

 

[USArmyVet]

My theory is after a win or a loss as to some staying off the forum for a day or two is that they know what is coming.
And sometimes they just don't want to read the onslaught of the good or the bad. Maybe they just don't want to respond, or be called out.

Dak has a great game, the Dak dislikers go away. Some come in and say he played great. Dak has a bad game and they are in full force, and many do not want to put up with all the negativity.
Some will read but do not respond, as they know the consequences. Others will respond. And it works the opposite way also.

We all know the drill. And some just want to argue at times and sometimes they don't.

...and those the defend Dak at all costs also bring the negativity after a win.

 

[Rockport]

Are you going to call out Rock and others for disappearing after a Dallas loss too?

Why would I come here after a loss like GB and see you haters pound your chest for a week? Y’all can’t wait for the Cowboys to lose.

 

[Rockport]

Has there been widespread talk about this? Or did you see one or two guys say it and then project that most Cowboys fans are saying this?

Way more than 1 or 2. It’s the usual cast of characters yourself included. In fact, rest this thread and all those trying to attack me are the ones that have made excuses for the Vikings.

 

[USArmyVet]

Why would I come here after a loss like GB and see you haters pound your chest for a week? Y’all can’t wait for the Cowboys to lose.

Awe, but you happily create 6+ threads after a win as you are nothing more than a fair weather fan.

 

[Jake]

This thread seems a lot more about indirectly calling out other fans than the Vikings.

 

[USArmyVet]

This thread seems a lot more about indirectly calling out other fans than the Vikings.

Started from the first sentence:

"There’s been many folks, talking heads and thus Zoners, who have been making excuses for the Cowboys win over the Vikings saying Minnesota lost the game because they gave up on the run"

 

[Rockport]

Awe, but you happily create 6+ threads after a win as you are nothing more than a fair weather fan.

Lying again. I created 2 threads about Dak. You’re desperate resorting to lies to push your “I hate Dak” agenda. Cute.

 

[JBond]

There’s a few posters here that stay quiet after a win. And if we go on a run they’ll be absent for it. So there is no negative, but I miss seeing them (awkwardly) weasel their way around being a fan of the Cowboys.

Same posters that bashed Diggs and Parsons.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

My theory is after a win or a loss as to some staying off the forum for a day or two is that they know what is coming.
And sometimes they just don't want to read the onslaught of the good or the bad. Maybe they just don't want to respond, or be called out.

Dak has a great game, the Dak dislikers go away. Some come in and say he played great. Dak has a bad game and they are in full force, and many do not want to put up with all the negativity.
Some will read but do not respond, as they know the consequences. Others will respond. And it works the opposite way also.

We all know the drill. And some just want to argue at times and sometimes they don't.

I'd say you are playing favorites here BIG time. On one hand "some came in" and on the other "FULL FORCE".

Ridiculous. Your sensitivity meter is off a little bit there. Dull on one side, overload on the other. Each one of these far-winged factions are equally rambunctious when they need to be a silent mode when they need to be.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

This thread seems a lot more about indirectly calling out other fans than the Vikings.

Precisely. It's my opinion that this is far too frequent, instigating, and bad for our community.

Along with a heavy dose of hypocrisy. Calling out other fans for "not being happy with the win"...by sowing division and dissent. Making people unhappy with the win. Or at least starting a good fight about it.

Where nothing or VERY little existed before. It's the most unified I have seen this board since early last year. But...here we go.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Way more than 1 or 2. It’s the usual cast of characters yourself included. In fact, rest this thread and all those trying to attack me are the ones that have made excuses for the Vikings.

You just keep being wrong.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

...and those the defend Dak at all costs also bring the negativity after a win.

Case in point. This thread.

Couldn't just be happy. Have to start a good scrum...board was just too nice this week. He knew what he was doing.

 

[starfan1]

Precisely. It's my opinion that this is far too frequent, instigating, and bad for our community.

Along with a heavy dose of hypocrisy. Calling out other fans for "not being happy with the win"...by sowing division and dissent. Making people unhappy with the win. Or at least starting a good fight about it.

Where nothing or VERY little existed before. It's the most unified I have seen this board since early last year. But...here we go.

Hes a bit sensitive when it comes to dak

 

[Vtwin]

I'd say you are playing favorites here BIG time. On one hand "some came in" and on the other "FULL FORCE".

Ridiculous. Your sensitivity meter is off a little bit there. Dull on one side, overload on the other. Each one of these far-winged factions are equally rambunctious when they need to be a silent mode when they need to be.

He definitely takes a side and adds to the dysfunction.

 

[jazzcat22]

I'd say you are playing favorites here BIG time. On one hand "some came in" and on the other "FULL FORCE".

Ridiculous. Your sensitivity meter is off a little bit there. Dull on one side, overload on the other. Each one of these far-winged factions are equally rambunctious when they need to be a silent mode when they need to be.

Not sensitive at all. And not playing favorites. Don’t know how you get that from my post.
Maybe you just want to argue.

Your last sentence was what I was getting at. I did say it goes both ways or did you miss or ignore that part.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Hes a bit sensitive when it comes to dak

It's not even that. I ..."hate"?....that he just wants to bully around the place. Muck it up. We can't have nice things...like going into thanksgiving on a beautiful positive note.

 

[jazzcat22]

He definitely takes a side and adds to the dysfunction.

BS,, I guess you didn’t read my post the correct way either.

 

[starfan1]

It's not even that. I ..."hate"?....that he just wants to bully around the place. Muck it up. We can't have nice things...like going into thanksgiving on a beautiful positive note.

I said before Ill say again this plays is the ranch on steroids. Dallas fans come in all forms I guess