The defense is an excuse for Tony Romo. He always has an excuse. Yesterday, he could not carry this team at any point in the game. If the running game had not been on par, we would've been obliterated. 07, 08, 09 we were a top ten defense, what did we accomplish? Last year when Baltimore won the Super Bowl, they were 17th in total defense we were 19th and couldn't even make the playoffs. Last year, 4 teams had worse defenses than the Cowboys, who, incidentally, made the playoffs. Let that sink in. So they had no excuses with worse defenses that made the playoffs.
2 years ago, New England barely lost the Super Bowl, guess what their defensive ranking was? 31st. Guess where Dallas' defense was ranked? 14th. Guess where the Super Bowl champs defense ranked that year? 27th
We didn't even make the playoffs that year.Guess how many teams made the playoffs that year with worse defenses than Dallas? 6. And guess who had the 32nd ranked defense that year, GREEN BAY. They were in the playoffs.
Shall I go on? I can if you need me to.
http://www.canalstreetchronicles.com/2013/8/23/4648848/nfl-defense-wins-championships
According to this list not one Champion has won the Superbowl with the 32nd ranked defense in anything since 2003. In fact that Greenbay defense everyone is claiming was so bad that was not only 5th in yards per game was also 2nd in points per game allowing only 15. Pretty easy to win games when your defense is giving up 15 points a game.
Another interesting thing here is that 6 times in those years the team that won had a defense ranked in the top 10 in INT's including 4 of the last 5. The one exception was the Ravens last year at 19th in that catagory. So those defenses do share one thing in common with Dallas defense this year, they got turnovers.
The worst defense in that run, yards per game wise, was the Giants a couple years ago averaging allowing 376.4 yards per game. Which is also the lowest ranking for a Superbowl champion in that catagory at 27th. 6 of those ten times the winner had a top 10 defense in this catagory as well.
5 of those ten times the winning team had a top 10 defense scoring allowed as well. For example the two times the Patriots won during this time their defense was 1st and 2nd in scoring allowing 14.9 and 16.2 points per game. The Steelers two wins in this time they gave Ben a defense that was 3rd and 1st in scoring defense allowing 16.1 and 13.9 points per game for those winning years.
Again it's pretty easy to win a lot of games, especially championship games, when your defense is allowing 14-16 points per game. By comparison just this year the Cowboys defense is allowing 426+ (32nd) yards per game, 26.8 (26th) points per game, 298.5 passing per game (32nd), and 128+ rushing per game (28th).
So, yeah, none of those QBs you're slobbering over won Superbowls with defenses playing anything close to the clip that the Dallas defense is playing at this year. With more time I could break down the Cowboys defense from each year in comparison to the teams that everyone is talking about playing so horrible on defense and I have zero doubt that I'd find that those 'horrible' defenses were quite likely playing far better than the Dallas defense was playing that year, and certainly light years better than this years trash version.