Personally I think early free agency is about plugging holes and that's pretty much it. If you can somehow get a great player on a deal that won't break the bank then fine but for the most part you are trying to plug as many holes with value players as possible. The whole point of this is to allow you to draft based on quality and not need. Thats what builds great teams. Its a proven strategy that most of the perennial contenders use and I don't understand why so many of you are trying to go against it.
Would I have liked to pick up a decent but not great pass rusher or safety so far?. Of course. Especially since it still is a hole for us. But I also don't want to over pay like almost everyone else does on these week 1 signings.
This is just the start of the team building period and some of you guys need to have more patience. We still have the draft to pickup a few difference makers. After that, everyone seems to be forgetting about all the vets that end up being cut in June for contract reasons. There is no reason to panic and there is certainly no reason to be throwing money around in the hopes that it somehow pays off. It rarely does.
I have no problem with not signing high dollar free agents. But when you stand pat and do little or nothing but then all of a sudden sign B free agents as supporting cast then you better be spot on with those selections. I want to know the opinions on the Zone what you think about standing pat on the Big Splashy signings this year. Do you agree with this strategy or not?
What is Free Agentsy? Is that like Free Agency??
Really running out of DE options. Still haven't resigned Hardy, Mincey or J. Crawford. And Gregory is out for the first 4 games. Currently our only DEs (the first 4 games) are Lawrence and Russell.
we are pinning last year on romo getting injured.
I have no problem with not signing high dollar free agents. But when you stand pat and do little or nothing but then all of a sudden sign B free agents as supporting cast then you better be spot on with those selections. I want to know the opinions on the Zone what you think about standing pat on the Big Splashy signings this year. Do you agree with this strategy or not?
I have no problem with not signing high dollar free agents. But when you stand pat and do little or nothing but then all of a sudden sign B free agents as supporting cast then you better be spot on with those selections. I want to know the opinions on the Zone what you think about standing pat on the Big Splashy signings this year. Do you agree with this strategy or not?
I think they tried to get Eric Weddle.
Here's the thing though with this patient frugal approach to FA. That's fine as long as you pair it with a long term team building approach in the draft. But if the failure to really address needs in March causes you to seek immediate impact in April you'll be hard pressed to build a winner. I'd rather see that immediate impact fixation in the FA period and draft pure.
As an example, if whiffing on a DE now "forces" us to draft Joey Bosa at 4 even though our scouts have a messiah type grade on Carson, that's a bad thing. A really bad thing. A we're all going to football hell bad thing.
I have no problem with not signing high dollar free agents. But when you stand pat and do little or nothing but then all of a sudden sign B free agents as supporting cast then you better be spot on with those selections. I want to know the opinions on the Zone what you think about standing pat on the Big Splashy signings this year. Do you agree with this strategy or not?
One player does not make a team. But in reality what would have been our record last year had Romo stayed healthy?we are pinning last year on romo getting injured.
Couldn't figure a way to change the title after seeing the spelling error, I should have deleted it and redone it.Beat me to it.
Hukt on foneks
I think we tried to out smart ourselves.
By waiting and waiting for second tier, we lost out. Now it's panic mode