TonyRomo17
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,813
- Reaction score
- 1,018
He might not be that expensive
only caught second half of game but DL looked beastly. Watched Gregory bull rushing OL back into QB. With Gregory and Lawrence really improving I am leaning on not resigning Hardy and use that money on signing two of next three options: DT/CB/LB.
Hopefully means, taking a risk on banking for them to become a force without the benefit of a proven pass rusher to draw the double teams that free up DLaw and Gregory for single blocking.
I wouldn't give up on him just yet, It has been a tough year on Hardy and his mind has not been in games at time. The time lost this year and last year has obviously effected him. I feel with a full camp that he can get back on track mentally and physically.
Assuming Gregory has same progression we've seen from Lawrence why bring back Hardy?
He's nice insurance in case one goes down but I still can't figure out where the holes are on this team aside from QB. Defense has allowed 16 or less points in 6 of the last 8 games and Scandrick will come back next year and Jones should be better.
I think if you can't get stud QB in top 5 trade down and take BPA.
Question is what in FA or resigning that needs to be done on own team is more valuable than Hardy? Does money spent equal return when Lawrence and Gregory are on their game?
Even when he wasnt double teamed Hardy has been pretty non existent except the Pats game. Great pass rushers get there share of double teams and still manage to get more then 5.5 sacks in 12 games.
If you do that, you can't use that draft pick somewhere else. That is the point of resigning him.Will it create a hole? Sure. Fill that hole in the draft.
If you do that, you can't use that draft pick somewhere else. That is the point of resigning him.
Sign him. He missed a year of football and still is a force. He's not even in his prime yet
If you do that, you can't use that draft pick somewhere else. That is the point of resigning him.
I think you're confusing prime with Golden years.
Nope
Who he is distracting? Yes I'm serious.
Depends on the deal he'll want.
I wouldn't discount the fact that D-Law and company benefited from the fact that Hardy was there.
I'd resign him if we don't have to pay exorbitant money. That's one less hole to fill via the draft.
The flip side to that is signing him to a large deal also precludes you from spending money elsewhere. Maybe it would be better to pour that money into Eric Berry?
It's going to be interesting to see if there is that much interest in him on the open market. If there is, I suspect he's going to be fairly pricey and it might behoove the Cowboys to look elsewhere. But if the suitors are limited and you can get him for a very fair deal, of course, it makes sense.
If you don't resign him, you have created another hole to fill.
With Muncie fading away..
Hardy becomes much more necessary.
I don't want us to invest a very high draft pick in the position with so many other needs.
And to me he has calmed down and applying himself. He can't expect to do it all. He needs more help.
If anybody is not needed its Crawford.
I never hear his name during games and b/w him and Hayden..
its a race for obscurity.