Obvious Logical choice 1st rd.

[Mongo]

I think the obvious choice is FS, hopefully Reggie Nelson. That said, there are many choices that can be justified.

 

[Champsheart]

I think the obvious choice is FS, hopefully Reggie Nelson. That said, there are many choices that can be justified.

Make that Meriweather the better player.

 

[jackrussell]

And the play that lost the Commanders game for us...

http://i89.***BLOCKED***/albums/k215/eduncan22/th_HenryBurnedByRedskins.jpg

:umm: So the score is Dallas 19 Washington 12.....and THAT'S the play that lost the game for us?

Searching for my video of TO dropping sure TD and the blocked FG.

 

[zrinkill]

Eduncan is the same guy who said Romo lost the playoff game for us ...... after all the stupid plays made by multiple players that day ...... he put it all on Romo .....

Who cares what he thinks.

 

[5Stars]

Searching for my video of TO dropping sure TD and the blocked FG.

:laugh2: And that pass was right there for the TD...but, T.O.'s broke finger got in the way!

It's all good...those two games gave the RedStinks some happiness...and ******...they deserve it!

 

[eduncan22]

:umm: So the score is Dallas 19 Washington 12.....and THAT'S the play that lost the game for us?

Searching for my video of TO dropping sure TD and the blocked FG.

It ties the game.

Without that play, we don't have to kick the FG [which is blocked]

We should have won, 19-15.

 

[jackrussell]

It ties the game.

Without that play, we don't have to kick the FG [which is blocked]

We should have won, 19-15.

So it TIES it.

That's not losing it.

 

[jobberone]

Henry has been injured and is getting older as we all are. TNew is almost as old BTW which should put that in proper prospective. But our third CB, which all teams need, is much older. So no matter how you cut the cake, we need a CB. Our scrubs are not starting quality and have been around long enough for us to know that.

We need a S and at least one CB. I'd feel better if we had two and with a draft this deep in CBs we should be able to get two good ones. We have enough picks that using two for DB or CB will not hurt us.

You guys can argue all day but we need to draft DBs in the draft and CB is a high priority. The fact we need a NT is irrelevant concerning drafting a CB in this draft. There isn't anyone available to draft in the first two rounds at the NT position to warrant not using the picks elsewhere. If Branch falls far enough then we should look at that hard.

And we do need a WR. We have two legitimate starters who will be 33 this year. Crayton is still an unknown when it comes to being a number 1 or 2 WR. I don't care how much he makes or anything else about him. He's not experienced enough to count on as a #1 or #2. So we need to draft some WRs with a pedigree. That's not being a snob. High draft picks have such a higher rate of success it's ridiculous to argue otherwise. Sure low picks and undrafted picks make it but less and less in these days of extremely high scrutiny of every player in the US.

We have all the DEs and LBs we need unless someone falls in our laps. That's regarding the first two picks only.

So a number one and two for a WR and DB is the best way for the Cowboys to go with pass rusher right beneath them.

 

[Silverstar]

yea i agree with you.. Henry is always hurt, glenn is old, reeves and jones havent shown much... WR is a luxury position Owens Glenn will be here next year and the year after that.. Crayton is among the best 3rd WR's to have in the slot.. and Austin and Hurd have shown great potential.. so WR would be a luxury selection mostly because this draft is very deep at WR... but if we dont draft a WR this Draft it wouldnt be the worst thing ever and wed still be ok for next year.. but if a CB isnt taken well be in worse shape

Ya know, I hope we don't pick a WR in the entire draft just so I can have a good laugh.