theogt said:Game plan around Randle El? Get your head out of your arse man.
Spurs21Cowboys22 said:Would you pay 25 mill over 6 years for a guy coming off a 35 catch, 558 yard receiving year?
for his career he averages ~ 40 catches, 500 yards receiving, and 2 tds per year
He might have been the best FA WR, but still overrated and overhyped. He's quick, not fast and he's short. I just don't get spending that much on a guy who will be the 4th most talented WR. Maybe they aren't planning on signing a 3rd string QB...
bbgun said:Give me a break. If we had signed him, we'd be singing his praises. Since it's the Skins, we're obsessing on his flaws. Petty.
SkinsHokieFan said:Seriously, how is the D slipping? And if we are losing dollars how are we on the verge of singing Archuleta and Andre Carter?
What I do agree with, to an extent is draft picks. I don't feel like making a long winded post about this on your board, but this is how the Commanders of the 80s were built, on free agents
The 1982 superbowl team had 26 free agents. Gibbs uses the draft not to fill particular needs, but to build some depth and have guys ready to step in a few years down the line. Players like Molinara, Broughton, McCune, and Campbell are examples of that
It does however give us less margin for error in the draft. But then again the Iggles have had double digit draft picks the past few years and have yet to win a Superbowl
And as all of us know, thats what it is all about
When you sign a proven commodity let me know.SkinsFan26 said:Gibbs has made it abundantly clear how enamored he is with free agency. He would rather spend money on proven commodities than college players.
BigDFan5 said:Randle El? I would have been pissed if we gave a kick returner a 30 million dollar contract with 10 mill in bonuses. Your Commanders envy is showing
I wanted Randle El. If for no other reason than it probably would have meant no TO.bbgun said:Give me a break. If we had signed him, we'd be singing his praises. Since it's the Skins, we're obsessing on his flaws. Petty.
SouthernStar said:That "joke" beat us twice last year, got into the playoffs and won a game there.
If Randel El isn't any good, then why do all the sites have him rated high?
I get a laugh out of some folks here. If WE had signed him, you'd be saying nice things about him.
5Stars said:So, you decide to come to this board to have your "homeristic orgasm "? Where were all you fools that last 5 or 6 years?
superpunk said:3rd ranked in 04, 10th in 05. Another slip like that will have you middle of the pack. There were some numbers on here the other day, comparing your defensive stats with Arrington starting, versus not. They were quite revealing. I know the only thing that matters, after years of toilet-bowl teams, in Commander land is the Cowboys....but you played other teams, too. Like him or not, your run defense is MUCH worse without LaVar. Hope Saunders has you guys around #1 next year, I think your defense will need it.
SkinsFan26 said:Lavar sucks and has since his injury.
When did the Skins? and don't call that game i saw a couple months ago a win. ouch.SkinsFan26 said:When did Dallas last win a playoff game?
MichaelWinicki said:It's above average but the guy is no burner.
theogt said:Offensive genuis? Now thats funny. Moss, Lloyd, and Cooley combined aren't in Hines Ward's category.
Z-Man said:This is BS.
Washington had to cut and scrape to get under the cap and yet they're making big splashes in FA. Yet all we have to show is an average O-Lineman and a visit with a backup TE and $20 million in cap room to spare.