Older Parcells video on Romo

[GimmeTheBall!]

I know about half of you are ready to give up on him because of injury and this is Dak's week but I still believe Romo is the guy to take this team to the promise land.

We have come to bury him, not praise him.

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

If Dak can lead this team to two deep playoff runs he already accomplished more than Tony. If you can do 4 playoff berths than he is tied with him. I think Romo broke too many of Parcells rules. That is why his Era is ending without success but stats.

If Dak, or any QB, can lead the Cowboys to 3 playoff wins, that is 1 more win than during the 8-8 Romo years.

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

I really miss his whole family.

http://i45.***BLOCKED***/albums/f78/dantanna86/parcells_zps6e29805f.jpg

Thanks for the coming nightmares ....

 

[percyhoward]

If Dak, or any QB, can lead the Cowboys to 3 playoff wins, that is 1 more win than during the 8-8 Romo years.

The "8-8 Romo years" is something the team, its coach, and fans should thank Romo for, because without Romo, those are 5-11 teams. These are average ranks for those three seasons:

Romo 7th
his defenses
pts allowed 22nd
DPR 28th
his running games
yards 24th
TD 25th
team avg rank 25th

 

[Stash]

The "8-8 Romo years" is something the team, its coach, and fans should thank Romo for, because without Romo, those are 5-11 teams. These are average ranks for those three seasons:

Romo 7th
his defenses
pts allowed 22nd
DPR 28th
his running games
yards 24th
TD 25th
team avg rank 25th

It's a damn shame that the organization could never do enough to support Romo during his prime years.

 

[CATCH17]

If Dak, or any QB, can lead the Cowboys to 3 playoff wins, that is 1 more win than during the 8-8 Romo years.

Don't blame 3 playoff wins on Romo.

The guy gets no help from his coaches or defense and we expect him to go win in the playoffs?

How much of his career did he play behind awful to mediocre OL's?


We've seen late 30's being a sweet spot for a lot of these QB's over the years. Romo will be no different.

 

[Sarge]

I only joined this forum yesterday so I don't have the ability to give likes yet but know this if I could I would like this !

 

[FLCowboyFan]

Wonder if romo has shared that list of things it takes to be a good QB with Dak

That's what I was thinking.

 

[waving monkey]

The proof is in the pudding. Garrett's incompetence is on full display whenever Romo's not there to bail him out of it. That's fact, and fully supported by an entire lost season in 2015.

Once you pull a logical argument out your behind then we can discuss the merits of proof and facts.[

 

[Angus12]

Which eventually netted us Demarcus Ware. Yeah, I'll never forgive that move.

Nope. The trade down involving Jackson and Jones eventually netted us Marcus Spears with that extra first rounder.

 

[Stash]

Once you pull a logical argument out your behind then we can discuss the merits of proof and facts.[

1-11 record in 2015 without Romo. And the '1' was a gift from Desean Jackson and had nothing to do with good quarterback play.

The Cowboys are 1-13 in the past three seasons without Romo under center. The Cowboys are 78-49 when Romo starts and 10-23 without him in the past decade, the vast majority of which was under the Offense of Jason Garrett. It's pretty simple: The Cowboys suck without their star quarterback, and Garrett can't win without him bailing him out.

And Garrett still can't approach the number of winning seasons (1) after 5 years that Parcells had in just 4 years (3). So anybody dumb enough to attack Parcells needs to realize that Garrett isn't even close to that level.

Deal with those facts. Or run.

 

[Stash]

Don't blame 3 playoff wins on Romo.

The guy gets no help from his coaches or defense and we expect him to go win in the playoffs?

How much of his career did he play behind awful to mediocre OL's?


We've seen late 30's being a sweet spot for a lot of these QB's over the years. Romo will be no different.

Who are "a lot of these quarterbacks"?

 

[Jinxx13x]

Thanks Sarge I appreciate that

 

[waving monkey]

1-11 record in 2015 without Romo. And the '1' was a gift from Desean Jackson and had nothing to do with good quarterback play.

The Cowboys are 1-13 in the past three seasons without Romo under center. The Cowboys are 78-49 when Romo starts and 10-23 without him in the past decade, the vast majority of which was under the Offense of Jason Garrett. It's pretty simple: The Cowboys suck without their star quarterback, and Garrett can't win without him bailing him out.

And Garrett still can't approach the number of winning seasons (1) after 5 years that Parcells had in just 4 years (3). So anybody dumb enough to attack Parcells needs to realize that Garrett isn't even close to that level.

Deal with those facts. Or run.

so causes and conditions play no role in your judgement

 

[ufcrules1]

I know about half of you are ready to give up on him because of injury and this is Dak's week but I still believe Romo is the guy to take this team to the promise land.

Lol denial is an ugly thing.

 

[Stash]

so causes and conditions play no role in your judgement

Facts do.

Try to refute the facts of the matter. You asked for 'em, you got 'em. Like them or not.

 

[ufcrules1]

The "8-8 Romo years" is something the team, its coach, and fans should thank Romo for, because without Romo, those are 5-11 teams. These are average ranks for those three seasons:

Romo 7th
his defenses
pts allowed 22nd
DPR 28th
his running games
yards 24th
TD 25th
team avg rank 25th

Give me 5-11 and better draft picks please. 8-8 is nothing more than torture.

 

[CATCH17]

Give me 5-11 and better draft picks please. 8-8 is nothing more than torture.

I agree with that haha.

Nothing worse then missing the playoffs by 1 game.

Drafting top 5 is awesome.

 

[percyhoward]

Give me 5-11 and better draft picks please. 8-8 is nothing more than torture.

If we hadn't lucked into Romo, and instead had to try to build a team from scratch every year, that would be bamboo under the fingernails.

 

[waving monkey]

Facts do.

Try to refute the facts of the matter. You asked for 'em, you got 'em. Like them or not.

OK then I'm through with this one. This argument of Garrett cant win without Romo has been tossed around
on this board and answered add nausea. Few coaches win with their back up QB because of the dearth of QB's today.
Yes there are examples of back ups coming in and winning but not so much.So causes and conditions do apply
even if you brush it aside. What your calling facts are examples to make your point.
When you over reach in your assertions it discredits your argument.