On This Day 10 Years Ago: The Dez Catch That Wasn't

MarcusRock

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,336
Reaction score
17,965
No.

it was called a catch on the field.

3 steps plus football move.
3 steps was not part of the rules at that time. Therein lies the rub of those who use today's rules to try to apply backwards. Since going to the ground applied, the football move Dez needed to make was holding on to the ball all the way through the ground.
 

gtb1943

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,933
Reaction score
7,917
Just goes to show you how stupid things are when the idea of some so called football move is even part of the discussion.
 

gtb1943

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,933
Reaction score
7,917
IT was idiotic when they changed the rule that had been around for decades because of the Megatron Play. You do not change rules that have held steady for that long because of ONE play. That started a process where you are getting it all the time
 

MarcusRock

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,336
Reaction score
17,965
Dez clearly caught the ball. Switched the ball from one side to the other. Took multiple steps, and reached out to extend the ball over the goal line. A clear catch, even by the rules at the time.
Not when you're going to the ground unfortunately. None of that stuff you mentioned matters unless Dez could execute a proper lunger per the rules. He did not.
 

gtb1943

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,933
Reaction score
7,917
Not when you're going to the ground unfortunately. None of that stuff you mentioned matters unless Dez could execute a proper lunger per the rules. He did not.
just shows you how stupid the rules committee were to put that word salad in
 

CWR

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,698
Reaction score
37,539
It's officially been a decade. And there have been many angles of debate from whether Dez did enough by the rules at the time to whether Romo made the right call in going for broke on a 4th Down. If the Cowboys had scored, would Rodgers had ruined it all anyway because that just what he did on the regular? Did Dan Bailey's blocked field goal (14-7 Dallas at the time) AND/OR Demarco Murray's fumble (14-10 Dallas at the time) keep Dallas from padding their lead that could have put the game out of reach? The no-catch gets all the press but there are questions upon questions that can be examined in that game. Take away the sting of the result and that was a great NFL playoff game. It's a shame that controversy obscures that fact. What say ye all these years later?



You must be feeling argumentative today.
 

CWR

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,698
Reaction score
37,539
We lost that day because the D, could never figure out how to get to a gimpy one legged QB the whole day. Not one sack on Mr. State Farm, who couldn’t even move in the pocket.

I take solace in knowing our defense would've folded like a lawn chair regardless. I dont feel like we got robbed of a win. We got robbed of a few more minutes of drama.
 

Cowboys5217

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,927
Reaction score
12,785
"I don't think he made a football move with it".......as he goes 14 feet with the football. Second biggest blown call in the history of football right behind Brady's fumble!
They changed the rules to justify screwing Dallas over. Plus, here's Cobb's "catch" in the first half. The replay ref fixed that game as clear as day.



It's ref culture to screw the Cowboys in big moments, often in direct opposite fashion from breaks they gave the other team like Cobb's "catch" that clearly hit the ground, and Dez's legit catch.
 

MarcusRock

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,336
Reaction score
17,965
You must be feeling argumentative today.
I'm out and about today. It's Cowboys history, is it not? What difference does it make whether I start a thread or someone else does that was inevitably going to to be made today given the milestone anniversary? I would've posted in either knowing the topic so well. Don't try to put that Rockport stank on me, lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR

CWR

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,698
Reaction score
37,539
I'm out and about today. It's Cowboys history, is it not? What difference does it make whether I start a thread or someone else does that was inevitably going to to be made today given the milestone anniversary? I would've posted in either knowing the topic so well. Don't try to put that Rockport stank on me, lol.

All I'm saying is you knew how this would go when you posted it. Lol
 
Top