cern
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,900
- Reaction score
- 21,050
Reaching far. Dak's endorsements and insurance are about 50 million annually. He's not worried.Reaching a bit?????
Reaching far. Dak's endorsements and insurance are about 50 million annually. He's not worried.Reaching a bit?????
Just can't help yourself can you.
I'm sure dude is a nice guy but every thread of his is some crazy rambling.What a stupid BS thread.
I don’t remember him always being this way but he has slowly evolved into a troll.I'm sure dude is a nice guy but every thread of his is some crazy rambling.
He was in a new commercial during the draft. He’s going to be the long term QB here and everyone knows it so not sure why his endorsements would be effected!Just my observation as a fulltime Cowboy fan and having been in the media as a professional photographer.
While Dak mitigates his contract..
no advertiser will feature him in upcoming commercials or appearances using the Cowboy logo.
Advertisers can not risk shooting Dak and suddenly he does not play for the team becuz of a dispute.
This is costing him multi-million and he knows it.
The longer this goes on, the more it will cost. It's now May and Dak is not signing in the foreseeable future. Commercials have to be written, cast and executed to get them ready to be used.
I have said many times before about how I feel about Dak and his issues. That is not what this is about.
This is my professional opinion and Dak needs to wrap this up. Otherwise, he will not be in mini camp nor ready for TC whenever the season is given the go ahead.
QBs like Wilson, Jackson, Mahomes, Brees and others are going to get the contracts as Dak remains in limbo.
That is a lot of money to leave on the table..free money if you will.
I really do hope he and the team come to terms soon.
Both sides need the good vibes and positive image going forward.
It’s paying him $50,000,000
Is that less or more than “some people seem to think”
That’s a lot of zeroes
You work as a Russian bot on Twitter?
JJ's dementia isn't as set in.Redball or the guy with the 250 million dollar yacht? Hmmmm
daks endorsements cant help him beat phillys scrubs
Anything may happen here.In 2015 Romo was earning about 5m in endorsements while Russell Wilson was earning 6.5m and Eli 9m. Dak not playing at Dallas might see a small drop in endorsement income and not paying tax is also probably a factor, but if he picked his team well it's not going to be a huge difference IMO.
TrollJust my observation as a fulltime Cowboy fan and having been in the media as a professional photographer.
While Dak mitigates his contract..
no advertiser will feature him in upcoming commercials or appearances using the Cowboy logo.
Advertisers can not risk shooting Dak and suddenly he does not play for the team becuz of a dispute.
This is costing him multi-million and he knows it.
The longer this goes on, the more it will cost. It's now May and Dak is not signing in the foreseeable future. Commercials have to be written, cast and executed to get them ready to be used.
I have said many times before about how I feel about Dak and his issues. That is not what this is about.
This is my professional opinion and Dak needs to wrap this up. Otherwise, he will not be in mini camp nor ready for TC whenever the season is given the go ahead.
QBs like Wilson, Jackson, Mahomes, Brees and others are going to get the contracts as Dak remains in limbo.
That is a lot of money to leave on the table..free money if you will.
I really do hope he and the team come to terms soon.
Both sides need the good vibes and positive image going forward.
It’s paying him $50,000,000
Is that less or more than “some people seem to think”
That’s a lot of zeroes
Reaching far. Dak's endorsements and insurance are about 50 million annually. He's not worried.
I think if you use logic..you will see it.How would companies make new commercials? Takes more than 10 people to shoot one, pretty hard for Dak to be in new ones if they're not being made.
But assuming that it's true, do we have an official sources, or is it just "from what I've seen"?
Has to be independently corroborated or otherwise it's just one person's opinion, which of course they're entitled to, but that doesn't make it so...