AbeBeta
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 35,745
- Reaction score
- 12,461
Hill had tweeted yesterday the NFL was against grandfathering in anybody fwiw
I'd bet you've got some owners pushing the other way.
Hill had tweeted yesterday the NFL was against grandfathering in anybody fwiw
Internet says there's a new drug policy. Might be announced in time to fly OScan back for the game. Certainly for week 2. That is huge!
Everyone does realize the legal repercussions that will occur if they reduce or eliminate any of these players suspensions? They broke the rules that were in place at the time. Players lost jobs because they broke those rules. It's comparable to me getting a speeding ticket for going 65 in a 50. Then months later they change the road to 65. I will still have that speeding ticket regardless IMHO
Internet says there's a new drug policy. Might be announced in time to fly OScan back for the game. Certainly for week 2. That is huge!
That's not really how it works. The NFL and the NFLPA negotiate these issues together. If the NFL wants HGH testing, then they have to give up something.
I'd bet you've got some owners pushing the other way.
That's not really how it works. The NFL and the NFLPA negotiate these issues together. If the NFL wants HGH testing, then they have to give up something.
So the NFL give up what? And how far back do you go? Gordon welker and scandrick all violated a rule that was in place at the time of violation. I find it extremely unlikely they would say.... Well since these are recent, you guys are off the hook. The rest of you.... Sorry you lost millions
I tend to agree with you.
I bet if the suspended players were no-name defensive linemen instead of names like Welker and Gordon, this wouldn't be happening.
Or potentially happening, as nothing has happened yet.
So the NFL give up what? And how far back do you go? Gordon welker and scandrick all violated a rule that was in place at the time of violation. I find it extremely unlikely they would say.... Well since these are recent, you guys are off the hook. The rest of you.... Sorry you lost millions
Did Green Bay or Seattle have anybody that would be affected? If they did, then it's doubtful that the NFL would let players return on Sunday if any players already missed the Thursday game.
That's the same question I had when I first heard about it.
I tend to agree with you.
I bet if the suspended players were no-name defensive linemen instead of names like Welker and Gordon, this wouldn't be happening.
Or potentially happening, as nothing has happened yet.
Go grab Gordon for your fantasy team now!!
So the NFL give up what? And how far back do you go? Gordon welker and scandrick all violated a rule that was in place at the time of violation. I find it extremely unlikely they would say.... Well since these are recent, you guys are off the hook. The rest of you.... Sorry you lost millions
Not saying it will definitely happen. But I listened to the DeMaurice Smith interview on my way to work yesterday and he was pretty adamant in saying that players in this football year should not be penalized under an obsolete drug policy. That's of course assuming the new policy is agreed to by both sides. I can't imagine the penalized players getting off scott-free but I'd imagine each case is currently being negotiated and a compromise will be made on each penalized player's penalty.
Also, if the NFL is as in tune with fantasy football as some people claim, then reinstating players at the very last minute would be screwing that up. I don't know if the NFL really cares about that, but many people say that they do.