Opinion: The Randle experiment is over

I am going to give every single RB we have on our an excuse right now because without Romo or Dez, every opposing defense will make weedon beat them with the pass.

Our running backs would be lucky to make any serious contribution from here on out at least until Romo comes back
 
Aven8 said:
What the hell can you do with this scheme with NO #1 WR?? Now we don't have a QB! We can at least see if Cmike can be one. If he isn't then oh well, nothing lost. I never said Randle was bad, we just need a bruiser to take pressure off of Weeds. The Oline needs that as well IMO
Click to expand...

Aven, my friend, fellow supporter of the sucksge of Garrett,


The answer is in your question. It's not Randle.. It's a bunch of other things.

A bruiser is not going to make a difference except we might be better in short yardage situations.

We need to create space or else the run game is going to suck.

100 yards rushing today is awesome but we can do better.
 
Still not sold on either Randle or Dmac, Randle had some moments today but overall the running game has been bland.

With Romo out, time of possession will no longer be won in all probability, pressure will be on the running attack and obviously Weeden/Defense.

We need them to figure a way to get this running game going consistently or it may get ugly quick.
 
Rogerthat12 said:
Still not sold on either Randle or Dmac, Randle had some moments today but overall the running game has been bland.

With Romo out, time of possession will no longer be won in all probability, pressure will be on the running attack and obviously Weeden/Defense.

We need them to figure a way to get this running game going consistently or it may get ugly quick.
Click to expand...

1st down has to be less predictable.


I can predict 9 out of 10 plays..

1st down is just awful.

Then you factor in all of the negative penalties we have and it just turns the run game into a mess.
 
RW Hitman said:
he was saying best RB on our team right now, not best ever

atleast that is how I think you must of misunderstood otherwise who is our best RB (don't say Dunbar because right now he is just WR as far as I am concerned).
Click to expand...

I know exactly what he's saying. I'm just simply stating that he's wrong. Randle is not our best RB on the team right now.
 
reddyuta said:
what are talking about,randle was outstanding today.the blocking abysmal to say the least and he still made something out of nothing.
Click to expand...

exactly, OP's position is nonsense talk and most likely flaming/hating. Must be weird to troll and post on our opponents boards
 
CATCH17 said:
1st down has to be less predictable.


I can predict 9 out of 10 plays..

1st down is just awful.

Then you factor in all of the negative penalties we have and it just turns the run game into a mess.
Click to expand...

We played a good front today but way too many predictable running plays and penalties.

Need to be more physical at the point of attack, Leary out did factor today.

Yet, even last week the running game has been blah, a two week sample and I am not impressed.

In addition, we need to get Dunbar and Dmac in space as well and the outrageous penalties and negative plays need to stop.
 
Rogerthat12 said:
We played a good front today but way too many predictable running plays and penalties.

Need to be more physical at the point of attack, Leary out did factor today.

Yet, even last week the running game has been blah, a two week sample and I am not impressed.

In addition, we need to get Dunbar and Dmac in space as well and the outrageous penalties and negative plays need to stop.
Click to expand...

I am not impressed either but it has more to do with the playcalling creating space.

Teams are swarming to the ball and everytime we run playsction I feel like it's a positive play.

Just spam playaction passes until teams back off a little.
 
SultanOfSix said:
Maybe Callahan is a bigger loss than expected. The Skins seem to be running well.
Click to expand...

Skins been running well since they got Morris, so it's not all Callahan.
They have had a good stable of RBs the past 3 years now.
 
Not sure if you watched the same game as me. He was really good running the ball. He was a little suspect in his assignments when he wasn't running, but as a pure runner, I'm not sure what more you want.
 
Corso said:
You need to start giving credit towards the talent on the other side of the field instead of being so myopic.
I was saying all week this Eagles team has real talent on their front 7.
They held Murray down both games last year.
Remember that? Of course you don't. I did.
Click to expand...

and the Giants front seven? Mr Myopic.
 
CowboyStar88 said:
That's because it's called an opinion. Guess you can comprehend that.
Click to expand...

Ok Einstein. The sun will not come up tomorrow. Also an opinion. An opinion with no factual evidence or basis has no merit or worth. Hey but keep working with your "opinions".
 
reddyuta said:
what are talking about,randle was outstanding today.the blocking abysmal to say the least and he still made something out of nothing.
Click to expand...

To me McFadden is the one that's done. Completely indecisive and easily down with arm tackle. Time to put Michaels in and McFadden on inactive list.
 
JoeBoBBY said:
and the Giants front seven? Mr Myopic.
Click to expand...

What about the Giants front 7? He averaged 4.1 per carry against a team focused on him.
Was that bad? Your vision gets no better...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

Total: 4,097 (members: 83, guests: 4,014)

Forum statistics

Threads
463,793
Messages
13,770,448
Members
23,768
Latest member
Versatile1988
Back
Top