- Messages
- 101,168
- Reaction score
- 110,286
OTA thread NOT a draft thread.
3rd season in a row with double digit wins isn't meaningless and can lead to a championship. Only a loser dwells on the bad picks when a lot of them are outstanding which has made them the good team that they are today.Which is rather meaningless if it doesn't lead to anything.
Only a complete loser cares about regular season wins.
About 90% of the starters were drafted by the Cowboys and they are the 3rd favorite to win the NFC.Yeah that.....one.
We trade picks for a vet this year because his pet cat Fehoko and Tolbert(thus far) can't play.
We trade another pick for a corner because his 2nd(Joseph), 3rd(Wright) and 4th(Robinson) round picks just weren't enough capital to address the position. Interestingly his self proclaimed pet cat Robinson is now playing in the XFL three years after being drafted.
We use our 1st round pick this year on a DT because our 2nd(Hill), 3rd(Gallimore) and 6th(Bohanna) also can't play.
A 2nd(Williams) and 3rd(McGovern) and we still don't have a starting LG that isn't an OT playing out of position.
But you're right. He sucked on that.....one.
You've been turned in to the mods for making height jokes. No short shots hereIf you make Deuce Vaughn the returner you will be giving the punter an extra second of hang time.
Then let them beat him out. Guys on rookie contracts don't effect the cap like vets do. Pennies on the dollar.Not while they’re taking up the roster spot of a potentially better player like Scott. He’s out there with the 1’s. It’s not only about the money.
He doesn't have the movement skills though.We've seen plenty of players need more than 2 years. Specially at one of the most difficult positions on the field.
Sure, that’s a given. But if that guy on a rookie contract isn’t contributing quality snaps, it’s still a waste. A waste of money, a waste of a roster spot, and in this case a waste if a third round draft pick.Then let them beat him out. Guys on rookie contracts don't effect the cap like vets do. Pennies on the dollar.
on Nashon Wright, its hard to hit on every draft pick. sometimes you miss. every team does. so if we blame Dan for Wright. how about Bland? I guess then we give credit to somebody else.1. Get Brett Maher back
2. Turpin won't do **** on offense
3. Nashon Wright is a turd. Stop thinking Dan Quinn can DRAFT
4. Tyler Smith is your Day 1 at LG (IF steele is healthy)
5. Dak will throw INTS
Again, I don't see the harm in letting them compete. I don't see the point in cutting him because we don't gain anything.Sure, that’s a given. But if that guy on a rookie contract isn’t contributing quality snaps, it’s still a waste. A waste of money, a waste of a roster spot, and in this case a waste if a third round draft pick.
I’m not against letting him compete. I’m saying that to this point, he’s a bust. And based on that, I don’t expect him him to ‘win’ any competition for a roster spot.Again, I don't see the harm in letting them compete. I don't see the point in cutting him because we don't gain anything.
Not sure that it does. There are several moving parts here because this is likely Tyron's last year. If Waletzko progresses to the point where he looks like a starter, it could mean Waletzko at LT and Tyler at LG is our best option. If one of the interior players steps up at LG, then we could keep Tyler at LT and give Waletzko a shot of replacing Steele next year at RT. However, we definitely don't know yet if Waletzko is going to even prove worthy of that shot.Does Waletzco progress effect Steele’s leverage in contract negotiations....or is that yet a leap?
You can't be a bust at pick #99 lolA bust pick. That’s on Dan Quinn.
You can't be a bust at pick #99 lol
Well it does if they think Waletzko can start at RT long term, but that's a long way away.Does Waletzco progress effect Steele’s leverage in contract negotiations....or is that yet a leap?
Perfect response. Obviously McClay has made some mistakes but why look at him in a vacuum? Compared to 32 teams, we by every metric (pro bowlers drafted/guys drafted who start/ guys drafted still on the roster) are a top 3-5 drafting team the last 8 or so years.Clearly, not the only one, but you can do the same with every GM, even any you might consider the best in the game. No one should be saying that McClay is perfect, but you seem to be holding him to a standard that is higher than anyone can meet. No GM is perfect at drafting. Few are even close to perfect.
Ozzie Newsome, one of the best in the game, drafted Kyle Boller in the first round in 2003 and had to take Joe Flacco in 2008 because of the miss. That's just one mistake by Newsome, many others could be referenced.
You're always going to have players who need more than 2 years at the bottom of the roster. Every team has those players. 3rd year guys who haven't shown much yet. Even with 4 year contracts. Development is still important.
It's his third year. If he shows nothing this year then fine but it is still player development. It will be fun to keep an eye on the CBs with you this year, my man.I’m not against letting him compete. I’m saying that to this point, he’s a bust. And based on that, I don’t expect him him to ‘win’ any competition for a roster spot.
Patience, Grasshopper.Football season is coming! Let's go!!