MC KAos;2451904 said:
The Sooners lost to Texas which is one of the best teams. Texas plain ole got outplayed by Tech which proved it WAS NOT a true contender as it got sent packing in Norman.
so your most impressive win was against a team that wasnt really a contender as you stated, and at home. the only "real" contender, then, that you played since tech wasnt one, is texas, what happened in that game? since you and most of the pollsters have a horrendous memory about football past two weeks ago, ill remind you that OU was just as dominant going into the texas game. they met a BETTER team and lost handily, no argument there.
and how did tech outplay texas in the second half? if that idiot gideon, who went to high school with my fiance, didnt drop that easy interception that even my 38 week pregnant fiance could have caught this would all be a mute point.
OU proved they can play in a big game, nasty environment, go back and forth, then close the deal in the end against a highly ranked team on the road.
ya, thats why OU hasnt won a bowl game in ages right?
Texas proved it was stale in it's loss to TT and beat an overrated Mizzou and struggled more than OU against OSU IN AUSTIN.
hey, just to let you know, no one has scored more that 39 points on UT, and all the teams that OU destroyed by scoring 60 points on, UT allowed LESS points against those same opponents while resting colt for the entire fourth, not having him play into the end of a 30 or 40 point win like bradford did last wekk
OU is the hotter team now, and has done enough to leap Texas whether it be because of it's non conference schedule, or great improvements as the season progressed.
again, OU was playing just as good before the UT game, so bad pont
OU took over and dominated the end of the game tonight. That's what champions do. If anything, Texas made a case for OU with their average play toward the end of the season.
ya, by allowing 16 points in the last two games? AWESOME POINT!!
You are just being close minded to the facts.
Tech was not a real contender, and OU proved it by dominating them. Texas got owned by them in the first half, and played average football in teh second and ultimately lost that ballgame.
OU playing well on the road against a high ranked in state rival was much more impressive than any UT win over KU or aTm. Oh and it's definitely more impressive than UT's loss to Tech.
No, OU wasn't as dominate early in the season. They could not establish a run against TCU, and struggled against Cincy's passing game. I should know, I was sitting in the stand for that game.
You're "OU hasn't won a BCS" argument is laughable. Wise up and realize it's 2008. Oh and not to mention OU has been the Big XII champion pretty much all of this decade.
Bottom line is, UT looked bad against OSU in Austin. They lost to Tech which was dismantled by OU. They destroyed a struggling KU. They destroyed aTm which might be the worst freaking team in the country.
Oh, and I love how you guys say you "handily" beat OU. OU was in the driver's seat for the majority of that game. It would've been nice if Demarco Murray was playing half as well as he is now. Also, Ryan Reynolds contributing to a defense that held UT to -6 rushing yards, then watching UT rush for 161 yards from the sideline had something to do with that loss. But of course you would say beatdown. Very laughable. You didn't beat us handily, you barely freaking won.
It's gonna be interesting to see what happens with OU now that they have lost their MLB, again.
UT was the better team in October, but OU has proven to be the better team in December with it's big, hard fought wins against worthy rivals.
If anything I'd give Colt McCoy the Heisman based on the head to head, but not the conference, or you'd have to factor in Tech.
One more time, OU's loss did not look as bad as Texas' loss.
OU vs. Mizzou for the 2008 Big XII Championship