Owen Schmitt

Hostile said:
Both. Want to know about 30 yard slants or different eras next?
:laugh2: at you thinking the offenses are the same now as they were in '92

a FB directly affects a RBs success which indirectly affects the QB
 
Thehoofbite;1952141 said:
this thread is getting to legendary status for a FB.

I know its a Commanders site but they have a huge list of mock drafts.

http://www.hailredskins.com/MockDraft.htm

Just thought I throw that out there. Maybe we can get this thread another 10 pages.
It's the off-season. We can get a thread about defining a blitz up to 20 pages.
 
Bob Sacamano;1952129 said:
does the FB directly or indirectly contribute to a QB's success?

Wow ...... I guarantee Aikman would not agree with you.
 
theogt;1952144 said:
It's the off-season. We can get a thread about defining a blitz up to 20 pages.
30 yard slant....
 
Bob Sacamano;1952143 said:
:laugh2: at you thinking the offenses are the same now as they were in '92

a FB directly affects a RBs success which indirectly affects the QB
I didn't say they were the same now as 92. Nor did I call you Larry Lacewell, nor hurl other insults because I didn't like what you had to say.

Toughen up buttercup.
 
Bob Sacamano;1952167 said:
let me welcome you to the offenses of latter day 2000

You think that offense would not be effective today?

You are really being silly tonight Bob. I still love ya though man.
 
Hostile;1952164 said:
I didn't say they were the same now as 92. Nor did I call you Larry Lacewell, nor hurl other insults because I didn't like what you had to say.

Toughen up buttercup.

I'm not the one crying here, Nancy
 
zrinkill;1952169 said:
You think that offense would not be effective today?

You are really being silly tonight Bob. I still love ya though man.

if you all but abandon your passing game in the 2nd half, you will lose

unless you could assemble a once-in-a-lifetime offense like that, than maybe you wouldn't, but of course you would have to outscore your opponent by a heck of alot before then
 
Hostile;1952176 said:
Post #399 of the thread Greta.

:laugh2: I like that, permission to use?

but you're reaching, Lace, just like you would if you took Schmitt in the 3rd
 
Bob Sacamano;1952186 said:
:laugh2: I like that, permission to use?

but you're reaching, Lace, just like you would if you took Schmitt in the 3rd
I may be reaching but you're not grasping.
 
Hostile;1952121 said:
BIGG is a weapon for Tony Romo. He didn't score a single TD in 2007.

There are 11 guys on the field. 10 of those guys do things to help a QB. The better they are at those things the better they are as a weapon.

Eh, I think you're redefining the traditional term of "offensive weapon" in this case, you know what I meant.

When you talk about weapons on offense, you're generally talking about people that put points on the scoreboard.
 
Mike Alstott 6'1" 248 2nd Rounder

Daryl Johnston 6'2" 242 2nd Rounder

Owen Schmitt 6'3" 253- 260 ????????

I do not want him before the 3rd or 4th round (pref)..... but this kid (IMO) is gonna be a Monster if he stays healthy.

The thought of him blocking for Barber is incredible.
 
zrinkill;1952218 said:
Mike Alstott 6'1" 248 2nd Rounder

Daryl Johnston 6'2" 242 2nd Rounder

Owen Schmitt 6'3" 253- 260 ????????

I do not want him before the 3rd or 4th round (pref)..... but this kid (IMO) is gonna be a Monster if he stays healthy.

The thought of him blocking for Barber is incredible.

You're skipping a few highly picked FB's there, I looked this stuff up myself early in the day.
 
zrinkill;1952218 said:
Mike Alstott 6'1" 248 2nd Rounder

Daryl Johnston 6'2" 242 2nd Rounder

Owen Schmitt 6'3" 253- 260 ????????

I do not want him before the 3rd or 4th round (pref)..... but this kid (IMO) is gonna be a Monster if he stays healthy.

The thought of him blocking for Barber is incredible.

i had the same thought when we drafted Fasano. Unfortunately the thought faded away.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,610
Messages
13,821,848
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top