Owen Schmitt

[theogt]

Yeah obviously....

What is it that you say? Getting on that crutch.

That is you being a hypocrite. At least i give detailed examples of teenage behavior and how yours mirrors it.

What age group resorts to calling people liars when they're proven wrong? Small children?

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Actually, in the beginning you didn't believe they existed. Then you stated that they ran the Combine, but that's all that they did.

Belief one way or the other means nothing. As I stated before i googled them and came up with the combine. I had heard of Blesto but you didnt even bring them up. There is no shame in coming into new information as you go along.

Anymore falsehoods you want to pimp?

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

What age group resorts to calling people liars when they're proven wrong? Small children?

I called him a liar becasue he was saying he works for USA Today when he doesn't. You act as if no one ever lies and if you call someone a liar then youre a child which is stupid.

 

[theogt]

Belief one way or the other means nothing. As I stated before i googled them and came up with the combine. I had heard of Blesto but you didnt even bring them up. There is no shame in coming into new information as you go along.

Of course not. It seems that I shed new light on subjects for you every day. It was obvious from the beginning of this conversation that you were "light on the info."

 

[theogt]

I called him a liar becasue he was saying he works for USA Today when he doesn't.

Prove it.

You act as if no one ever lies and if you call someone a liar then youre a child which is stupid.

You ask for evidence. I provide it. Then you have to literally resort to calling someone a liar in order to protect yourself from being wrong. Your fragile ego just can't take it. That's childish behavior.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Prove it.

i already did. I provided the search link. I did my part now you prove that he does.

 

[theogt]

i already did. I provided the search link. I did my part now you prove that he does.

How exactly does this prove that he doesn't work for them? Can you find every employee for USA Today through google? Seriously, this is one of the dumbest things I've ever read on this board.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

How exactly does this prove that he doesn't work for them? Can you find every employee for USA Today through google? Seriously, this is one of the dumbest things I've ever read on this board.

He works for SportsXchange as their DBA for NFL Draft Scout. I showed you a link from 2005 where he was on a panel on a single article from USA Today. Since then Sprtsxchange has done other things for the paper and not once was he listed.

Now youre purporting that hes an accountant?

The only one thats being stupid here is you.

 

[theogt]

He works for SportsXchange as their DBA for NFL Draft Scout. I showed you a link from 2005 where he was on a panel on a single article from USA Today. Since then Sprtsxchange has done other things for the paper and not once was he listed.

How does this prove that he doesn't work for them? Take me through the steps logically.

Now youre purporting that hes an accountant?

Huh? Are you on drugs?

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

How does this prove that he doesn't work for them? Take me through the steps logically.

Huh? Are you on drugs?

I went to USA Today itself and looked. Thats not google. He hasnt done anything for them since 2005.

Google turns up that he runs NFLDraftScout.com and not any relation for USA Today.

Are you going to try and say that although his relationship to USAToday 3 years ago was through Sportsxchange, that he now works for both?

Becasue he does work for the one and he hasnt done anything for USAToday in the capacity that he previously had for 3 years.

 

[theogt]

I went to USA Today itself and looked. Thats not google. He hasnt done anything for them since 2005.

Prove that he hasn't done anything for them since 2005.

Google turns up that he runs NFLDraftScout.com and not any relation for USA Today.

Ok, how does this prove he doesn't work for them?

Are you going to try and say that although his relationship to USAToday 3 years ago was through Sportsxchange, that he now works for both?

No, I'm not trying to prove he does work for them. You're the one calling him a liar. Prove that he's a liar.

Becasue he does work for the one and he hasnt done anything for USAToday in the capacity that he previously had for 3 years.

Again, prove that he hasn't done anything for USAToday in the last 3 year.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Anyway i emailed him and asked him point blank if the 4.57 time was reported by Blesto and or National. Once i get a return fromt hat i am going contact BLESTO and the combine.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Prove that he hasn't done anything for them since 2005.

Ok, how does this prove he doesn't work for them?

No, I'm not trying to prove he does work for them. You're the one calling him a liar. Prove that he's a liar.

Again, prove that he hasn't done anything for USAToday in the last 3 year.

youre asking me to prove a negative and you can always infinitely regress on that. i know this tactic.

the evidence i have presented is more than reasonable.

 

[theogt]

Anyway i emailed him and asked him point blank if the 4.57 time was reported by Blesto and or National. Once i get a return fromt hat i am going contact BLESTO and the combine.

While you're at it, tell him you think he's a liar.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

While you're at it, tell him you think he's a liar.

if i get the response i think i will then you better believe i will.

 

[theogt]

youre asking me to prove a negative and you can always infinitely regress on that. i know this tactic.

I just want some proof. You say he doesn't work for them. He says he does. Where's your proof?

the evidence i have presented is more than reasonable.

How is it reasonable? What logical steps get you from point A to point B?

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I just want some proof. You say he doesn't work for them. He says he does. Where's your proof?

How is it reasonable? What logical steps get you from point A to point B?

He worked for them in a certain capacity and although the company he works for still has relations with USA Today in that capacity, he no longer does. Instead he works in a different capacity running a website.

Really youre being intentionally obtuse. Its blatantly obvious that he is using that blurb from three years ago to try and pimp himself just like he tosses out BLESTO and the combine to you and you just eat it up.

 

[theogt]

He worked for them in a certain capacity and although the company he works for still has relations with USA Today in that capacity, he no longer does.

Prove this.

Really youre being intentionally obtuse. Its blatantly obvious that he is using that blurb from three years ago to try and pimp himself just like he tosses out BLESTO and the combine to you and you just eat it up.

I just want proof of your bold assertions. If you're going to call the guy a liar, prove it. Otherwise you look like a child.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Prove this.

I just want proof of your bold assertions. If you're going to call the guy a liar, prove it. Otherwise you look like a child.

You did this with the WR thread last year. I went to google and put intwo things:

a) Brian Hitterman
b) sportsxchange

Hittermans name pops up from something from 2005. If he has done anything for them since then they do not acknwoedge or credit him in any way shape or form.

The fact that there is no citation from him in 3 years is compelling.

 

[theogt]

You did this with the WR thread last year. I went to google and put intwo things:

a) Brian Hitterman
b) sportsxchange

Hittermans name pops up from something from 2005. If he has done anything for them since then they do not acknwoedge or credit him in any way shape or form.

The fact that there is no citation from him in 3 years is compelling.

How is it compelling? Do they list every employee and every employee of every independent contractor on the internet? Does he have to be listed in a recent article to be considered an employee? How is this proof that he's a liar? How does this show anything?

My employer doesn't have my name listed on the internet. Do I not work for them?