Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
how has this ridiculous question gone on 7 pages?
So many people saying, "Yes, he should return."summerisfunner;1246410 said:how has this ridiculous question gone on 7 pages?
theogt;1246416 said:So many people saying, "Yes, he should return."
LaTunaNostra;1245149 said:There is no player in the league who is indispensible. None who is irreplacable.
Owens is no different.
Of course he can be replaced.
In the first year it'll probably take a stud draft pick and/or a vet the quality of say, Lav Coles (just for 'talent level example, he won't be available), plus more complete integration of the the promised two te sets, and Tony's ongoing development.
I don't see 'mediocrity' for this O with Owens gone..not at all.
More and more I buy the idea that Bill does not want Owens back. Bob Glauber at Newsday, a pretty reasonable scribe, yesterday maintained he has sources who confirms this.
A story on it.
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,650215956,00.html
PS. Every receiver needs a complement. But none needs one particular guy and no one else.
PPS. I'd rather win with Owens than lose without him. But I'd much rather win without him than with him.
Bias and hatred tends to make people irrational.YoMick;1246427 said:Lets face it... a POLL would piss off all the TO HATERS... LMAO
I honestly think that some would rather mediocrity without Owens than Winning with him.
It amazes me.
theogt;1246445 said:Bias and hatred tends to make people irrational.
bbailey423;1245867 said:If we can pry Andre Johnson from the Texans...or bring Randy Moss in....YES!
Bleu Star;1247098 said:*head explodes*