Parcells on NFL network

[junk]

A Ty Law trade.

Ah, that one isn't buried yet?

I heard Ellis is on the block.

 

[Alexander]

From Camp article today.

Parcells buried his face in his hands when quarterback Tony Romo made an errant throw in team drills.

I think I will spin this one off the road ATV style and have this turn into a 15 page thread.

Okay, let's try this.

he buried he head in his hands :winkie:

Time to get a new QB in here!

ROMO - gone book it signed BIG contract-GONE...next.....

all those with agendas about ROMO your prejudice is slaying your objectiveness.

AND YOU STILL TRY AND DISMISS issues at ROMO as Parcells clearly shows his anger....

All those lambaste me who come after me BRING IT!!

 

[Gaede]

Haha, just read the first page.

It's amazing how everyone was always on Al Singleton for never making plays and generally dissappearing.

But now that Nors is saying the same thing, only more um, aggressively--suddenly everyone wants to stand up for Al S.

Interesting how things work!

 

[Nors]

Haha, just read the first page.

It's amazing how everyone was always on Al Singleton for never making plays and generally dissappearing.

But now that Nors is saying the same thing, only more um, aggressively--suddenly everyone wants to stand up for Al S.

Interesting how things work!

Dude is what he is a marginal player - I don't see why the mass feels the need to rally around him.

He is not a fit in our 3-4 and is overpaid. Writing on the wall.....

 

[Rack]

Darren Howard anyone? staying 4-3 anyone? Hybrid anyone?

I can add - thats what separates me from those that can't read Parcells math.... Did you read all my blatant post by BO in offseason at LB? AND YOU STILL TRY AND DISMISS issues at Als as Parcells lashes out....

What do Darren Howard, the 4-3, or Hybrid have to do with the post you quoted?


Lay off the crack pipe, Nors.

 

[Nors]

Als

endangered species!

We drafted 2 OLB's cuz we had no playmakers there. See Als cap hit......

Al and crew had how many sacks last year at LB? how many turnovers? I'd be embarassed trying to defend that......

 

[Rack]

Dude is what he is a marginal player - I don't see why the mass feels the need to rally around him.

He is not a fit in our 3-4 and is overpaid. Writing on the wall.....

Nobody's rallying around Als, per se, we're just questioning your logic, or lack thereof.

 

[Nors]

Nobody's rallying around Als, per se, we're just questioning your logic, or lack thereof.

Rack: Guess you need this slowed down too....

1) He is not a playmaker
2) He is not a 3-4 LB
3) His cap hit is crazy

Riddle me this!

 

[Rack]

Rack: Guess you need this slowed down too....

1) He is not a playmaker
2) He is not a 3-4 LB
3) His cap hit is crazy

Riddle me this!

Oh so now you're attacking me?


Funny coming from someone that often cries about betting "attacked" by everyone else.


1.) You don't have to be a playmaker to be an asset to a team.

2.) He IS a 3-4 OLB. I saw him on Saturday lining up with the STARTING defense, doing a solid job as a 3-4 OLB.

3.) 2 million dollar cap hit is NOT "Crazy". Gimme a f'in break.


4.) Put the top 3 in your corn flakes and choke on it, loser.

 

[Hostile]

From Camp article today.



I think I will spin this one off the road ATV style and have this turn into a 15 page thread.

Okay, let's try this.

he buried he head in his hands :winkie:

Time to get a new QB in here!

ROMO - gone book it signed BIG contract-GONE...next.....

all those with agendas about ROMO your prejudice is slaying your objectiveness.

AND YOU STILL TRY AND DISMISS issues at ROMO as Parcells clearly shows his anger....

All those lambaste me who come after me BRING IT!!

You know, that was really good.

 

[31WillHammerU]

Your 4-3 wanna be is just that

Howard aint here and last I looked he aint coming through that door anytime soon. We drafted 3-4 and are 3-4. Your 4-3 boy Alsmall is in serious risk at OLB in a 3-4. What amuses me most is you don't even see the peril your boy is in. Dude - He's "ripped" and bigger than Ware.... next.....


Catalytic is he?

Nors, Al is here and will stay because....

Rob Phillips article from DallasCowboys.com:

Cowboys head coach Bill Parcells doesn't like waxing philosophical
on the subject of football, at least to reporters.

But one conclusion can be gathered from his off-season flock of free
agent signings: Parcells believes the revival of the Dallas Cowboys
cannot take place without several battle-tested players by his side.
Some who have been through past wars with him. Others who have
reached the NFL's summit and tasted Super Bowl success.

New Cowboys linebacker Al Singleton fits right into Parcells'
perspective.

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

The opening post, and many afterward in this thread....annoys me.

Over Dramatizing something to try and fit an agenda is getting VERY old.

 

[Alexander]

The opening post, and many afterward in this thread....annoys me.

Over Dramatizing something to try and fit an agenda is getting VERY old.

And it will continue.

I think many people like to simply jump the idiotic blabbering. It makes it look like there is an actual football conversation going on for five pages.

And you also wonder if some individuals are clowning for attention by posting nonsense.

 

[31WillHammerU]

The opening post, and many afterward in this thread....annoys me.

Over Dramatizing something to try and fit an agenda is getting VERY old.

Agendas? :laugh2: What Agendas?

Singleton today, Henson tomorrow. The 34 is on deck. We perpetuate the problem by replying to the thread in the first place.

 

[Jarv]

From Camp article today.



I think I will spin this one off the road ATV style and have this turn into a 15 page thread.

Okay, let's try this.

he buried he head in his hands :winkie:

Time to get a new QB in here!

ROMO - gone book it signed BIG contract-GONE...next.....

all those with agendas about ROMO your prejudice is slaying your objectiveness.

AND YOU STILL TRY AND DISMISS issues at ROMO as Parcells clearly shows his anger....

All those lambaste me who come after me BRING IT!!

Well, in middle school they taught us how to write HAIKU poems. Alexander, you are "Great", you've mastered Norism...Blindly connecting dots to match ones own personal agenda.

It took me 3 years to figure out pig latin...

 

[Avery]

Yawn.

I've read all five pages and feel like I'm still at square one.

Once someone can seperate factual information from perceived factual information, PM me.

I don't think anyone in here is questioning Al's play as we are all pretty much aware that he wasn't the brightest spot on defense last year. Come to think of it, the unit as a whole wasn't.

However, this topic is entirely based on grievances and agendas which are not proper forms of mediation.

How many threads about this do we really need? I am growing tired of reading the same argument on this board day after day with no pertinent facts being displayed.

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

Yawn.

I've read all five pages and feel like I'm still at square one.

Once someone can seperate factual information from perceived factual information, PM me.

I don't think anyone in here is questioning Al's play as we are all pretty much aware that he wasn't the brightest spot on defense last year. Come to think of it, the unit as a whole wasn't.

However, this topic is entirely based on grievances and agendas which are not proper forms of mediation.

How many threads about this do we really need? I am growing tired of reading the same argument on this board day after day with no pertinent facts being displayed.

SOSDD and if you don't know what that stands for you can PM me for the details lol.

It gets so old to come in every day and know there will be a 3/4 (pro or con), LB or backup QB agenda fest at the very least.

It is one thing if I see the title of the thread and it says Romo This or Henson that and so on...a title that gives you an idea of what the thread is about so you can either not go into the thread, or at least be prepared for the type of thread that it will be.

However too many times it is a normal title that peaks your interest (like this one) only to be led down that familiar dank road to agenda or egoville.

It is also cropping many times in threads where the topic has nothing to do with one of those things only to have someone come out of nowhere to turn it into one of those threads.

Sadly as much as one person annoys me with these tactics, he is not the only one to do it nor (pun intended) is he the one that always starts it.

Either way it is old and annoying....and this goes beyond someone just wanting to take football IMO.

 

[Nors]

Had a clip on him tonight.

He BLASTED his OLB, Said he was real concerned there.



We know Ware is going to be a playa, Burnett getting BP/MZ love quitely.

This is not good news to the LB with a $2M cap target on his back.........wrong side of 30.

Time to get Burnett on the field and starting!

Parcells blasted his OLB in PC, Nothing but football in this post.
I read the 5 pages a lot of drivel there - look in the mirror.

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

Parcells blasted his OLB in PC, Nothing but football in this post.
I read the 5 pages a lot of drivel there - look in the mirror.

He never blasted the OLB in PC...he only said he had concern about depth...however I am sure it is much easier to use the word blasted in CAPS in order to further show your agenda vs Al Singleton.

 

[Nors]

I heard it - he blasted OLB's then softened it with a depth comment.


I don't use the A word - thats getting old.

If upgrading sub standard football players is it, then I have one.