Ranching
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 46,510
- Reaction score
- 111,988
Yep, you're a good fan....Dak pocket presence sucks by the way!
And he moves like he has concrete in his shoes.
Lets take that 2 yard sack so my completion % remains high!
Yep, you're a good fan....Dak pocket presence sucks by the way!
And he moves like he has concrete in his shoes.
Lets take that 2 yard sack so my completion % remains high!
Yep, you're a good fan....
I'm numb to the relentless negativity, but that was pretty funny.You’re right.. We should try him at QB.
As well as throw and catch a TD.I'm numb to the relentless negativity, but that was pretty funny.
Don't you know Parsons would LOVE an opportunity to line up once at QB? lol
Only for 50 years. I am a Cowboys fan. I am not a Dak fan!Yep, you're a good fan....
Jimmy was the architect of those teams..Jerry was a great owner at that time,he provided the financing.. Jerry did a great job of getting the Organization out of financial ruin...the problems arose when Jerry wanted to take credit for the team success on the field..which he did not do..Jimmy built the roster and coaching staff..Jimmy revolutionized the draft and was brilliant at acquiring talent for his style of play...Jimmy did not "self destruct"...Jerry's ego couldn't take the fact that Jimmy got all the credit..which he very much deserved...Had Jerry let Jimmy continue on his path ,whether coach or even making him GM..the dynasty could very well have continued into the 90's..Case and point..Jerry hired Barry and tried to acquire talent through the draft and FA..and guess what happened..they sucked all the way till he brought Parcells inMuch more than The Trade went on and why Jerry deserves strong credit for Dallas Cowboys history. Mr. Murchison and Tom Landry became the basis for legends, but Jerry and Jimmy weren't bad until Jimmy self destructed...his way.
Jimmy was the architect of those teams..Jerry was a great owner at that time ththsththst provided the financing.. Jerry did a great job of getting the Organization out of financial ruin...the problems arose when Jerry wanted to take credit for the team success on the field..which he did not do..Jimmy built the roster and coaching staff..Jimmy revolutionized the draft and was brilliant at acquiring talent for his style of play...Jimmy did not "self destruct"...Jerry's ego could take the fact that Jimmy got all the credit..which he very much deserved...Had Jerry let Jimmy continue on his path ,whether coach or even making him GM..they dynasty could very well have continued into the 90's..Case and point..Jerry hired Barry and tried to acquire talent through the draft and FA..and guess what happened..they sucked all the way till he brought Parcells in
..
So explain to me what isnt correct in what I wroteYou believe the rewrite of your history...sorry guy.
Lost three, this is Lost One...you looking for Lost too? See a recruiter to fully understand...you ring tapped and lied.
So explain to me what isnt correct in what I wrote
.becuase that's exactly how it went down
Jerry was the finance and business end..Jimmy built the team...It certainly wasnt Jerry's eye for talent..or his choices for HC..I guess it coincidence that after Jimmy left they haven't done anything past a division round trip..and Super Bowl XXX..was with Jimmy's players...I'd like to know what Jerry did post Jimmy, other than the financial end?..so let me know how I re wrote history.
Gotcha genius..i'll.quote another from CZListen carefully Son, get a copy of Sullivan's 50 Year Anniversary book and read it...bet back to me AFTER you have read it through. Other wise, to ignore...
Many of you think he's a Godsend, but will still blame Dak if we lose on Sunday, even if it 65-58.......which is it?
If Dak throws a pick 6 with the game tied at 58, he deserves his blame. His mistakes aren’t excusable.
Can't pick and choose....if you don't support the QB, turn in your fan card....does it make you feel better to diss him?Only for 50 years. I am a Cowboys fan. I am not a Dak fan!
Thats funny...even funnier when I saw that the only guy I have on ignore gave you a like!
So, correct me if I'm wrong, but are you saying that Dak should not get any blame if we only score 6 points the entire game and he throws a game losing pick 6? lol
I was just asking.Read it again... Here... I'll bold it for you.... We could be tied 6-6. If Dak throws a pick 6 and we lose, of course it would be on Dak...
Oh brother.....Hall monitor?
C'mon man!This entire thread is an attempt at 'hall monitoring'.
Come on man....
Can you tell us what rule that violates? I'm calling you out to tell us which rule number that is... or shut up. Waiting.Aren't callout threads a violation of site rules?