What in the world are you talking about?
I said a second contract with a rb is more probable to be a contract you regret than it is for other positions. Because.... well because it's true. Rbs have steep decline in performance after age 27. Usually right when you give them that fancy second contract. That is assuming, obviously, that the player you pick at 4 is the type of player you'd expect.
Now guaranteeing someone being a hall of Famer was in response to a ridiculous hypothetical and my answer in kind made that obvious. The guy asked if Emmitt was worth the 4th pick in shilling for Zeke. So sure if Zeke is Emmitt let's take him. He very likely is not a and so taking a rb that high who you'll pay just as a step decline likely happens is foolish.
Apparently most everyone realized that except for you. That is why I asked you to please follow the conversation.
Hope that cleared up your utter confusion around a rather simple back and forth.
As usual, you fail to directly answer challenges and then back out because you know for a fact you are out of your league intellectually.
You have one thing: RBs have a steep decline in performance after age 27.
That's it.
And honestly, if we take a player at 4 and he burns out in five-six years and I have a title to show for it, I am perfectly fine for it.
Even the positions you champion, especially DB do not have the shelf life.
This very thread, this one, talking about Patrick Robinson, a first rounder, we are actually looking to get him cheap on his third contract.