Then quit arguing with me.
Well your teasing them with information that you can't divulge doesn't do anything to stop them.
WTH are you talking about? I have barely commented in this thread except regarding some of the legal concepts, and now your ***** tease comments.
I really don't care why you changed your opinion, or what your opinion of him is. I'm just saying your act has grown tired long ago. You did this same thing back when the NFL lockout was going on. I find it terribly convenient that you knew someone who knew De Smith, and you formed your staunch opinion against him off that one person's opinion, and crowed around here like you had some great source of inside information.
Then when this story comes about, not only do you "know" Paterno, but now you've been privy to some inside information from a source "incapable of communicating" which again, you can't divulge.
It's also not saying much for your "knowledge" of Paterno if you flip-flopped your position on him as a result of one conversation, or whatever it was.
The charade isn't impressing anyone. If you know something, then prove it. If not, then excuse us for not being impressed.
Again, I've barely commented in this thread other than for a few topics. So I'm not sure what lemmings you're referring to. And if you're worried about my "handle" on things, then feel free to correct me where I've been wrong.