I've said this for years, but never as succinctly as Mike Fisher put it.
"Drafting for need is football suicide. Needs come and go. Talent stays for 12 years."
That's exactly right.
It is for 31 NFL GM's. The other guy seems to be able to repeatedly get away with whatever he wants.
I agree with his comment but the NFL is a win now league and you have coaches and gms who need to keep there jobs now.
Drafting rules are useless. Every draft is different. You never know what position may get a run or how trades will change the board.
Drafting for need is how you fill holes. Do you take the 8th best CB or the best OC because the CB is rated a little higher but you need an OC.
What if you have Witten at TE. Do you take TEs in the 2nd round because they have the highest rating? And who's ratings are you using because yours may be inherently biased.
Drafting rules are useless. Every draft is different. You never know what position may get a run or how trades will change the board.
Drafting for need is how you fill holes. Do you take the 8th best CB or the best OC because the CB is rated a little higher but you need an OC.
What if you have Witten at TE. Do you take TEs in the 2nd round because they have the highest rating? And who's ratings are you using because yours may be inherently biased.
So the standard draft rule of drafting BPA should stand...however some confuse this with Best Athlete Available....
So if Ramsey is the BAA and Zeke is the BPA....who should you take?
Isn't it funny how Fisher put this so perfectly after Sturm wrote 1500 words on this about four weeks ago?
Love me some Fish. Surely he was not plagiarizing an idea. Simply paying an homage to Sturm.
"No one ever pays an homage to a director or his work. They simply steal it." Quentin Tarantino.
I've said this for years, but never as succinctly as Mike Fisher put it.
"Drafting for need is football suicide. Needs come and go. Talent stays for 12 years."
That's exactly right.