silver
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,873
- Reaction score
- 1,697
Zeke is BPA. But the idea that a running back is going to stay for 12 years just doesn't line up with reality.
We only need him for the next 3 years to make a last run with Romo.
Zeke is BPA. But the idea that a running back is going to stay for 12 years just doesn't line up with reality.
LOL. You draft talent at positions you need. The Cowboys have followed this and have done well with it. That quote is nothing to me. You need a pass rusher, a linebacker and a corner or safety. Go and get the best one.
Now when you are trading for a need in the draft that's when it comes back to bite you. But you sit there at #4 and you take the best player for a need? I don't see how that is a problem or how it will bite you.
The idea of a player being number 1 on a board and another being number 2....people take that relative rank way to strictly.
In 2007 the Bucs needed a pass rusher. They drafted Gaines Adams for need. 3 players later the Vikings drafted Adrian Peterson. Peterson was a better college player than Gains Adams. This is what is meant by drafting the best player instead of the best player at your position of need.
We only need him for the next 3 years to make a last run with Romo.
This.
Obviously you don't want to draft for need, but you'd be an idiot to not consider the state of your roster when determining who to take when you're on the clock.
With that being said, I wonder what Jerry and co will do if SD takes Ramsey and we're staring at Tunsil. I'd be cool with a trade down; just not too far down.
We only need him for the next 3 years to make a last run with Romo.
You can't be entirely ignorant to the current makeup of your roster.
Tampa drafted Cadillac Williams 5th overall in 2005. I'm not sure there's any team in the league that would be so slavish to BPA that they would use two Top 5 picks on the RB position in a span of 3 years.
BPA is great until BPA just happens to play a position where you have someone. BPA may be how you miss out on an Adrian Peterson, but it also seems to be how you end up with Martellus Bennett and Gavin Escobar riding the bench for entire careers with the team that drafted them. Bennett didn't necessarily ride the bench but it's hard to imagine the BPA process that drafted him had him pegged as a 6th OL.
You trade down or you take Bosa. To me it's clear cut.
So the standard draft rule of drafting BPA should stand...however some confuse this with Best Athlete Available....
So if Ramsey is the BAA and Zeke is the BPA....who should you take?
Well said.
Our OL is an example this year where you may look the other way on BPA if Tunsil is available.
Admittedly I do not follow college ball; but a lot of folks seem to think Bosa has bust written all over him. I wonder what the Cowboys think of him. If they do take him 4th overall, I just hope it's because they truly believe he's the truth, and they aren't reaching.
I haven't heard bust a lot.
Just a well above average guy who will play a decade.
Nothing exceptional. Exceptional is fun.
Above average is boring.
I've said this for years, but never as succinctly as Mike Fisher put it.
"Drafting for need is football suicide. Needs come and go. Talent stays for 12 years."
That's exactly right.
And that is why you stay away from Bosa at 4.
well I haven't seen a single ranking with Zeke rated above Bosa do wouldn't Zeke be the wrong pick if you go bpaWhy I think it's either Ramsey or Elliot.
I think of it in ratios...BPA is about 90% of the decision in rd 1 with the other 10% being need....as the draft moves on, that goes to more of a 50-50 split...
The risky assumption being that Romo plays for 3 more years.
That's my biggest concern in the draft room, scouts' voices getting drowned out by coaches. Coaches looking short term and scouts looking at long term/best talent.