Kevinicus
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 19,830
- Reaction score
- 12,612
Statement of fact as you lied in the post.Ok calm down you don’t want to get benched for name calling….its not worth it lol.
Statement of fact as you lied in the post.Ok calm down you don’t want to get benched for name calling….its not worth it lol.
What? What did I lie about?Statement of fact as you lied in the post.
AbsolutelySo wins are a qb stat?
It was just Arizona and we lost.Put an asterisk next to it. It was just da Commanders.
tell us you don’t understand football without telling us thatAbsolutely
I'm not talking about emotional judgements, if you and I watch the same play, it's very likely that we see it a little differently. You can't take the human out of the evaluation process because, what are the stats for guards, tackles and centers?I could be wrong but I don’t think PFF uses an emotional measure when determining a grade. These grades are based on data/numbers and a formulation. I also believe they have definitions on how certain metrics are established which should eliminate any bias. However if you’re trying to prove a point you can pick and choose how to present that data.
And quarterbacks that were supposed to be, better than him had less playing themPut an asterisk next to it. It was just da Commanders.
And beat them last year when they were supposed to be betterYou mean the same Commanders who almost beat the Eagles twice this season?
Got it!
Wasn’t that before the fire sale before they threw in the towel on the season?You mean the same Commanders who almost beat the Eagles twice this season?
Got it!
Talk about being a hater and troll.....lol!Talk about cherry-picking statistics.
Put an asterisk next to it. It was just da Commanders.
We have us a QB!.
You think fantasy football is new?I didn't know PFF was compiling stats in 2007. I thought they came in about with fantasy football.
The site was launched in 2007. That's the info I was looking for.You think fantasy football is new?
I think you’re on an island on this one. Wins and specifically championships have been the gold standard measurement for great QBs in the Super Bowl era. The only great QB that gets a pass for never winning a chip is Dan Marino.tell us you don’t understand football without telling us that
No, a lot of great QBs have played crappy teams since 2007, so no asterisk needed.Put an asterisk next to it. It was just da Commanders.
while QBs unfairly get more blame and more credit there is no doubt that wins are a TEAM stat that QBs can have an impact on. Im not even gonna ask why based on your analysis why Marino gets a pass. Trent Dilfer,Joe Flacco and Brad Johnson some of the super era greats.I think you’re on an island on this one. Wins and specifically championships have been the gold standard measurement for great QBs in the Super Bowl era. The only great QB that gets a pass for never winning a chip is Dan Marino.
Right, it doesn’t on this particular team but the drought does carry a cloud over the franchise which drives much of the criticism and narrative.Oh of course lol. Criticism and narratives are just media fodder to me. What we did in 1999 has no bearance on the 2023 team.